Answer:
Kurtz and the pilgrims acted as per the local culture and other factors
Explanation:
In different settings, Kurtz and the pilgrims acted differently as per the local society and other factors.
In Belgium, Kurtz and the pilgrims acted in a civilized way as they found the society very civilized but lacking in depth.
In Congo, Kurtz and the pilgrims acted like savages and started taking up their cultures and norms. They started killing enemies and displaying their skulls as an award or something of pride.
On the steamer, Kurtz was weak and was dying. Hence, he was vulnerable and therefore, Marlow thinks that Kurtz is a good person after all.
Sociologists consider both a portrait by rembrandt and the work of graffiti spray painters to be aspects of.
<h3>What is Culture?</h3>
This refers to the way of life of a particular group of people by engaging in shared acts such as dancing, singing, etc.
With this in mind, we can see that sociologists considers works of arts by different artists in different eras as a critical aspect of culture which they feel is necessary for socialization.
Read more about culture here:
brainly.com/question/25010777
Undoubtedly, there needs to be a certain degree of arms proliferation in all countries in order to secure their borders from external or internal threats. However, when the military budget of countries like the USA, the world´s largest power, is far greater than the budget destined to meet other needs of the State, these latter ones are unavoidably neglected, to the detriment of the country´s people. On the other hand, if a greater budget is destined to the building of infrastructure, history shows —like in Japan and Germany— that the economy becomes less dependent on warfare and relies more on human capital and culture.
The question then becomes whether economic gain through arms proliferation is more advantageous to the welfare of the people or if the wellbeing of the people —through the building of infrastructure— is more beneficial to any given government. Since the wellbeing of the people is, in principle —based on the International Bill of Human Rights—, the aim of all countries, these should be more preoccupied with the building of infrastructure.
