Arrow A represents the direction of the electric field vector at the position of the dot.
A dot indicates the location of an electric charge at a certain location. The electric field line will radiate outward in the case of a positive charge. If the charge is negative, the electric field will radiate outward from it. The direction of the electric field at a certain location is not, however, shown by the dot. As a result, reading the values of negative signs on a field line is useless.
As compared to the negative charge, the positive charge, Q, is twice as distant from the dot. We must first measure the intensity of the electric fields in order to determine the electrical field at a certain location. The positive charge is represented by +Q in Figure Q20.5, whereas the negative charge is represented by -1. The intensity of the electric field at a spot represented by a dot must thus be equal to the total of the electric fields pointing in that direction.
Learn more about electrical field, here
brainly.com/question/15800304
#SPJ4
Erikson's main idea of what happens if you do not master the conflict of a given age (the equivalent of a Freudian fixation) is identity crisis. Each conflict has two parts: the successful outcome one wants, and the negative outcome which comes from failing to master the conflict. Tye conflict of adolescence is identity vs confusion. If one should fail to master this conflict, they will be confused as to who they are, will not feel like they fit in, and will waver between varying personality types in an effort to discover their identity.
Answer:
Explanation:
In this scenario while taking two psychology courses of cognition and learning and are giving midterm exams tomorrow. Once you finished studying for your cognition test, and are attempting to study for the learning exam. While you find it difficult to recall the material on learning; you are experiencing proactive interference. It refers to the interference which effect of previously learned materials on the acquisition and retrieval of newer materials. If we take an example in today's life it could be the difficulty in remembering a friend's new phone number after having previously learned the old number.
Answer:
Conflict in systems occurs in chain reactions.
Explanation:
Answer:
on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
Explanation:
Both Brown V. Board of Education and parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle presented their case on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
In Brown V. Board of Education, the court ruled that 'separate but equal' was an unconstitutional provision and that the practice of segregation was 'inherently unequal'. It further ruled out that these unequal provisions violated the equal protection laws.
Similarly, the parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle claimed and argued that racial tiebreaker in district schools subjugated and infringed 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
Though the initial plan of the racial tiebreaker system was to prevent racial imbalance in schools, the court adjudged that the system was unconstitutional because it, more or less, contributed to unequal opportunity in getting admissions.
