During the Cold War era, the USA and the USSR were hesitant to go to war with each other because of

2 answers:

6 0

Both sides had enough nuclear buildup that if one directly attacked the other they could destroy the world. So achievements like the space race and smaller wars fought in the middle east coupled with the fall of the Soviet Union determined the winner. It was basically an endurance test.

nikklg [1K]3 years ago

5 0

Nuclear war duh. That's why it was called the Cold War in the first place there was no fighting to begin with. It was just a series of threats and who could have the best things like the Space Race.

You might be interested in

The fact that if the price of milk, butter, or cab rides increases, people might switch to soy milk, margarine, or the bus, is a

frosja888 [35]

The answer to your question is C. I just took the test and i got c as the correct answer.

5 0

3 years ago

Many white southerners felt that federal action in desegregating Little Rock Central High School was similar to action taken dur

gtnhenbr [62]

The correct answer is reconstruction

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What are two powers of the states? military schools national security police

Alina [70]

Answer:

Police and schools

3 0

3 years ago

Why did liberal democratic leaders oppose the new deal? Check all of the boxes that apply.

geniusboy [140]

A) It did not do enough to help struggling Americans.

7 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did religious division intensify the Ottoman-Safavid state rivalry?

ziro4ka [17]

<span>Religious beliefs have highly influenced the political and hierarchical structures in both Ottoman and Safavid Persia empires. Although both states were of Islamic religion, they belonged to different branches, Sunni and Shia. These branches differ over the choice of Muhammad's successor, which subsequently acquired broader political significance, as well as theological and juridical dimensions. Sunni Muslims believed that Muhammad didn’t clearly appoint a successor, which is why there isn’t hereditary succession law in Ottoman Empire. This contrasts with the Shia Muslims view, which holds that Muhammad appointed his son-in-law and cousin Ali ibn Abi Talib to succeed him. They believed that the empire should be led by direct successor of Muhammad’s line. Differences between these two branches affected the politics, as Shia Muslims weren’t religiously tolerant to other confessions and considered them for heretics, even the other branches of Islam. This resulted in the besieged of Bagdad, which was followed by the massacre of a large part of its Sunni Muslim inhabitants, as it was endeavored to transform Baghdad into a purely Shiite city. The besiege of Bagdad was the event that led to the Ottoman-Safavid war (1623–1639).</span>

7 0

3 years ago