In most approximate way it can never be the area of the circle (Accurate area)
This is why because after creating base lines of each triangle it forms an inscribed polygon .
- Some little spaces left over each side or b_n
So
h is already approaching to r
- and b_1+b_2..b_n is approaching to the perimeter i.e 2πr
Option B
The answer will be Proportional
3.5 + 2 = 2x - 10
5.5 = 2x -10
+10 +10
—————————
15.5 = 2x
—— ——
2 2
7.75 = x
7.75 is the answer
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
GPA = NO + B1Study + B2work + B3leisure + B4sleep + u
1. No it makes no sense. There is an intercorellation between these explanatory variables. Changing study while holding the rest variables constant or fixed would not make sense. If study us changed then one or more of the other predictors should be changed so that they can still be equal to 168
2. Study is a perfect linear function of work, leisure and sleep. There is the problem of multicollinearity among these independent variables. One assumption of the MLR is no multicollinearity.
3. To reformulate model, you have to drop the variable that is having the issue. Let's say that leisure is dropped from the model. After this the assumption is satisfied.
GPA = b0 + B1Study + b2sleep + b3work + u
