It seems as though the Author's purpose is to appeal to a reader's sense of positivity.
Do you have any pic? That will be helpful and that way I can answer that to you :)
The argument does not show how peppermint oil should be used, which could lead to public rejection of this product.
We can come to this answer because:
- Coffee is a product well known by the public, who already know its effects and how to use it.
- To show a product that can completely replace the coffee of the article readers' lifetime, the author should present a product that is equivalent to coffee.
- Although the author presents peppermint oil as an alternative product to coffee, the author does not explain the usage formats and the effect of this oil.
- This promotes incorrect reasoning, as the reader will not be able to see the equivalence between the two products.
In this case, the author did not make a good comparison between the two products, as it reinforces the practicality of consuming coffee and makes peppermint oil inaccessible.
It should be remembered that the above question does not show all answer options and the options presented are incorrect.
More information:
brainly.com/question/4117438?referrer=searchResults
I think its subject-by-subject comparison, hope this helps
Answer:
Committee is spelled correctly I hope this helps u :)
Explanation:
