1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yKpoI14uk [10]
3 years ago
5

How can you describe the amount of territory controlled by the axis powers by 1942

History
1 answer:
faltersainse [42]3 years ago
7 0
In 1940, the Axis Powers (Germany, Italy and Japan) signed the Tripartite Pact that then came to be known as the Axis Alliance. Even though the Axis Powers concurred in their stand against the Allies, their wars towards their expansionist agenda were uncoordinated.

You might be interested in
What was the result of the Munich conference?
Temka [501]
The Munich Conference came as aresult of a long series of negotiations. Adolf Hitler had demanded the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia; British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain tried to talk him out of it.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HURRY I NEED BY 9, 45 POINTS
Gnoma [55]

Answer:

You can do the article and title part. (I'm making this short, so it won't meet all the requirements, so add on to what I am writing about.)

Explanation:

(First Paragraph) Add More to This!

The Louisiana Purchase, a purchase that doubled the size of the United States, greatly strengthened the country materially and strategically, provided a powerful impetus to westward expansion, and confirmed the doctrine of implied powers of the federal Constitution. This gives us the powerful nation we are to call home to this day, and for I am given the pleasure to explain why this event made that so.

(Second Paragraph)

The Louisiana Purchase was a big deal. The United States was having issues using the port of New Orleans. Western farmers needed to use this port to store and to ship their products. When we learned that Spain had transferred the Louisiana Territory to France, we offered to buy New Orleans and West Florida from France. It also ensured that France and probably other European countries would not try to take the land. (Now talk about this more)

(Third Paragraph)

The Louisiana Purchase in 1803 was extremely important to the United States because it dramatically expanded the size of the country. It essentially doubled the size of union. (Now talk about this more)

(Fourth Paragraph)

The Louisiana Purchase demonstrates Jefferson's ability to make pragmatic political decisions. Although contrary to some of his central principles, guaranteeing western expansion was so important to Jefferson's overall vision that he took bold action. The gains were dramatic, as the territory acquired would in time add 13 new states to the union. (Now talk about this more)

RESTATE FIRST PARAGRAPH IN DIFFERENT WORDS

5 0
3 years ago
After U.S.-led invasions in the early 2000s, Afghanistan and Iraq changed from dictatorships to democracies. Is it right to spre
rodikova [14]

Answer:

Although the United States intervened in Iraq after it began its intervention in Afghanistan, it is withdrawing from Iraq first. Therefore, what the United States has and has not accomplished in Iraq will be discussed first.

It must be said to begin with that the United States did achieve some important successes in Iraq. It destroyed the brutal regime of Saddam Hussein — something that the Iraqi population had not only been unable to do on its own, but may not have been able to do later either. If Saddam had managed to transfer power to his sons (who were reportedly just as, or even more, vicious than their father), the regime may have survived for years or even decades.

In addition, the U.S.-led intervention helped the Kurds in northern Iraq. They had suffered terribly under Saddam Hussein but were able to solidify the tenuous autonomy they had achieved (also with U.S. help) after the 1990-91 Kuwait conflict and even build some prosperity in their zone.

Although Iraq’s Arab Sunni tribes were initially hostile to the U.S.-led intervention and fought an insurgent war against it, American forces were eventually able to make peace and work with most of them.

Most important, the United States organized and protected the holding of relatively free and fair elections at both the national and local levels. This allowed Iraq’s Arab Shia majority, which had also suffered dreadfully under Saddam Hussein, to play a leading role in Iraqi politics for the first time.

In addition to these successes, however, the United States has had some noteworthy failures in Iraq. First, the failure to halt the massive violence, looting and infrastructure breakdown that took place throughout the country immediately after the collapse of Saddam Hussein’s regime. This was caused by the Bush administration’s failure to anticipate and plan for the aftermath of Saddam’s downfall as well as to deploy enough troops to maintain order. As a result, the initial gratitude displayed by much of the Iraqi population toward the United States for delivering it from Saddam quickly disappeared.

Further, despite a massive troop presence, the United States was unable to prevent or stop the large-scale ethnic-cleansing campaigns that violent Arab Sunni and Arab Shia groups conducted against each other’s communities. These campaigns were so successful that some observers attributed the decline in violence in Iraq in 2008-09 not to the American troop surge ordered by President Bush, but to the ethnic-cleansing campaigns having largely completed the violent work of segregating the Sunni and the Shia communities from each other.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Why are Representatives terms of office are shorter than Senators?
lapo4ka [179]

Answer:

To guarantee senators' independence from short-term political pressures, the framers designed a six-year Senate term, three times as long as that of popularly elected members of the House of Representatives. Madison reasoned that longer terms would provide stability

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was ironic about the relationship of great britain and american during the french and indian war? british soldiers took up
otez555 [7]
Yes it is geoge washishington

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which best describes the bush doctrine of preemption ?
    14·1 answer
  • Who started the common school movement
    13·2 answers
  • In mcculloch v. maryland, the supreme court established that congress had the power to
    10·2 answers
  • What is the term political socialization defined as? whether or not you vote the way you measure your opinions the way your opin
    5·1 answer
  • What would happen if there were more free states?
    6·2 answers
  • Select the reasons why crusaders joined the fight:
    14·1 answer
  • Are revolutions necessary to make changes in a nation? Why or why not?
    14·2 answers
  • Question 5 / 5
    10·2 answers
  • To determine how many Electoral College votes a state has, which of the following would you need to know?
    9·1 answer
  • Match the items.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!