What are the arguments for and against electing judges rather than executive appointment or legislative selection?

1 answer:

6 0

The first is the appointment method, in which the executive of the state nominates an individual to become a judge, and (usually) the state senate must confirm the nominee before he or she takes office. The second method is known as “retention elections,” in which the executive will appoint a judge to the bench, and then after a certain term, voters are asked whether or not they want to retain the judge. Finally, there are “competitive elections,” in which judges run for their seat in more or less the same way that other elected officials run for office: they are nominated by a party (usually through a primary election), and then they run against a nominee from the other party in the general election.

You might be interested in

What aspects of the war were very misleading to many men?

Vladimir [108]

Answer:

Explanation: Soldiers' attitudes towards the Great War are a controversial issue, as they ... This topic has sparked many interrogations, and a degree of ... most of the men classified as "deserters" in 1914 were actually living ... But there was also a negative, coercive aspect to the upholding of cohesion and obedience.

4 0

3 years ago

How is the United States government based apon John Locke’s idea of a social contract?

Damm [24]

Answer:

The government of the USA, that is, those who rule, do it by the consent of those ruled. This is the key idea of the social contract. The people, the nation´s sovereign , express their consent by voting for those who are in power, for those who represent them. This is today´s expression of John Locke´s idea.

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

How did the Association of Licensed Automobiles hold back tourism?

Neporo4naja [7]

Answer:

d. it kept the purchase cost for cars high

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

How did supporters feel about Jackson

Lana71 [14]

They felt that when he destroyed the second bank of the USA, founded the Democratic Party

7 0

3 years ago

“equal rights for all, special privileges to none” was the slogan of the:

nevsk [136]

Jefferson and Jackson both used the slogan "equal rights for all, special privileges for none." 
At that time it was a time of white supremacy especially for men and blacks had no rights. African Americans even after getting their freedom were treated with prejudice and had no right to vote etc. Making the slogan just a slogan and not achieving the targeted goals.

3 0

3 years ago