Klamath corporation has insufficient information to find ROE.
Return on equity (ROE) is the degree to of an agency's internet earnings are divided by using its shareholders' equity. ROE is a gauge of a corporation's profitability and how successfully it generates one's income. The better the ROE, the higher an employer is at changing its fairness financing into income.
ROE is used while evaluating the monetary performance of agencies within the identical enterprise. it's far a measure of the capability of management to generate earnings from the equity available to it. A go-back of between 15-20% is considered good.
The return on equity is a degree of the profitability of an enterprise with regard to fairness. Because shareholder's equity may be calculated with the aid of taking all belongings and subtracting all liabilities, ROE also can be the idea of a return on belongings minus liabilities.
ROE=Profit margin*Total asset turnover*Equity multiplier
Hence since Equity multiplier data is not given.
Learn more about ROE here: brainly.com/question/26849182
#SPJ4
B because it the right answer there
Answer:
Cindy has more amount than Jimmy.
Explanation:
Amount invested by Cindy P = $3000
Annual rate of interest = 8%
As the amount is compounded semiannually
So rate of interest
%
Time = 20 year
So time period n = 20×2 = 40
So amount own by Cindy 
$
Amount deposit by jimmy P = $3000
Annual rate of interest = 7.75 %
As the amount is compounded monthly
So rate of interest
%
Time period = 20×12 = 240
So amount own by Jimmy 
$
From the calculation we can see that Cindy has more amount than Jimmy.
The answer to the question is because the effort to visit the legislators are too great.
Unfortunately, even though the audience members support your perspective, often times, people are reluctant to follow through on the actions needed to make the change. This is a common issue found in various parts of society – from your work life to your personal relationships.
Answer:
Nathalie provides a cosigner on her loan
Explanation:
In the case when an inidvidual co-signs the loan so the individual is become obligated in a legal way to repay the full loan with respect to nathalie when she is not able to pay the amount. Also the loan officer would permitted in that case when the co-signer has the stable kind of job or the source of revenue.
So, nathalie not sign the car of the parent as the collateral as it required the parent consent
So the above should be the answer