La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
A pesar de que no anexaste opciones o incisos para responder a la pregunta, podemos comentar lo siguiente.
Previo al Frente Nacional, existió en Colombia un modelo de gobierno auspiciado por el general Rojas Pinilla. Este gobierno se caracterizó por ser autoritario en el cual, en mayor o menor grado, las instituciones ejecutivas, legislativas y judiciales son controladas por las fuerzas armadas que impiden cualquier forma de control democrático. A este tipo de gobiernos se les conoce como dictaduras militares y totalitarias.
En el caso concreto del General Gustavo Rojas Pinilla, instauró un gobierno militar después de conseguir con éxito un golpe militar que depuso al Presidente en turno, Laureano Gómez. Rojas y su autoritario gobierno militar comenzó en 1953 y duró hasta 1957.
Este tipo de gobierno, comúnmente se caracterizan por suprimir las libertades individuales y limitar la libre expresión de los ciudadanos.
Answer:Q1 is false
Q2 corrupt
Explanation: 1. Muckrakers mainly exploited big businesses
2. Political machines are small groups of people who’s main goal was to get their own candidates elected for all the top jobs the city has to offer, once in control they used that power to make their leaders rich
Patrick Henry, a great orator from Virginia was the one who raised his voice against the British policies. He was a lawyer and patriot and gave the famous slogan " give me liberty or give me death ". He was the one who supported right to bear arms and fought against the stamp act. He was one of the founding fathers of American revolution and after Declaration of Independence he was made the governor of Virginia.
Answer:
Communism opposes everything in America
Explanation:
This may be a huge explanation I'm about to write due to how objective I have to be to answer this question. Communism is both a economic and social idea in which Marxism and Authoritarianism are combined. A lot of Americans were taught to hate communism because America is a capitalist world and is he leading business tycoon in the world, which means that even before any communist nations even existed, America still hated communism. Communism is an ideology that is always considered to be labour comprehensive and proceeds in the direction of labour rights, while America has no concern for labour interests. There are going to be nations I'm going to use in this example, The USSR and China (not Taiwan). These two Nations use Communism in a sort of autocratic way. Let's start off with China; China uses communism in an autocratic way that prevents you from being able to protest, and if they wanted to do some project or something they wouldn't give the slightest care if thousands of buildings and edifices were to be destroyed. Now we have the USSR; the USSR was under many autocratic regimes and one we could all agree on is Stalin's regime. Stalin in some sense wasn't really a communist, but just a straight up dictator that killed 10s of millions. There was the Ukrainian potato famine which was supposed to prove that collectivization worked, but instead it killed an estimate 20 million, we then have the great purge which killed 1.2 million, and then we have world war 2 which killed 27 million. This proved America that communism is hell and should never be trusted in America. What I'm trying to say here is that Communism takes away a lot of people's rights and killed millions in the past, and America wants to have these rights to give opportunity and freedom to everyone. I know the industrial revolution also killed millions too because of the upper class exploiting the workers, but that is a discussion for later.
The military plans laid before World War I presupposed a major war between the countries which were tied together with alliances. Because the Triple Entente had Britain, France and Russia as allies, Germany thought if a war began it would need to fight on two fronts -- west and east. So German Field Marshall Alfred von Schlieffen drew up war plans that said attack France first, quickly, and then hold that territory while deploying forces to contend with Russia in the east. So when Germany declared war on Russia in 1914, the first thing it did was to go and attack France. Thus the war spread and became instantly a more global conflict.
National leaders in politics and the military need to learn caution when dealing with alliances and when committing themselves to military action. Restrained, limited military actions are preferable to the all-out plunging into war that was seen in the outbreak of World War I. Diplomacy should be given its best chance to work before resorting to military options -- even if military options have been pre-planned.
