1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mazyrski [523]
4 years ago
14

Compare the economic strategies embedded in Lenin's war communism, his New Economic Policy, and Stalin's Five-Year Plan. What we

re the aims of each program? Which was most effective?
History
1 answer:
KengaRu [80]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

1. The aims of  Lenin's war communism, his New Economic Policy-

Was to revive the Russian economy by making a temporary retreat from the <em>complete nationalization of War Communism. The new policy was a  mixed economy - combination of private enterprise and state socialism. </em>This is because the people did not believe in War communism.The New Economic Policy <em>created a more market-oriented economic system, “a free market and capitalism, both subject to state control.” </em>

<em />

<em>Consequently, the mixed economy allowed private individuals to own small enterprises, while the state continued to control banks, foreign trade, and large.</em>

2. The aims of Stalin's Five-Year Plan are:

<em>The five-year plan concentrated on developing heavy industry and collectivizing agriculture, at the cost of a drastic fall in consumer goods.</em>

This plan had two main objectives – <em>the removal of property and attainment of self-reliance. </em>This was planned through the promotion of higher growth rates, better income distribution, and also a significant increase in the domestic rate of saving.

<em>3. The most effective is Lenin's war communism, New Economic Policy.</em>

Explanation:

<em>The most effective is Lenin's war communism, New Economic Policy because that was a paradigm shift from the traditional war communism policy which has contracted the economic prospects of the Union. The New economic policy introduced a mixed economy of socialism and capitalism, which opened up all the frontiers of the economy for bigger prospects while the </em>

<em />

<em>Five-year Economic plan of Joseph Stalin was a huge fiasco because it set-out goals that were unrealistic—a 250 percent increase in overall industrial development and a 330 percent expansion in heavy industry alone. Stalin declared the plan a success at the beginning of 1933, noting the creation of several heavy industries where none had existed, and that the plan was fulfilled in four years and three months instead of five years.</em>

<em />

<em>Another recorded flaw was about  one million kulkaks Stalin forced to deport. Agriculture production was damaged but industrial production did increase causing the First Five-Year Plan to not be a complete failure. This plan was not as successful as planned in the first Five-Year Plan.</em>

<em />

You might be interested in
The _______ government branch makes sure that the legislative and executive branches obey the constitution.
Anni [7]
The Judicial branch.
3 0
3 years ago
Even though Great Britain was at odds with France over the situation involving the Suez Canal. Why did It side with France as wo
laila [671]
Even though Great Britain was at odds with France over the situation involving the Suez Canal, it became in side with France as World War I began because England believed France had a better chance of winning the war. France at that time has the capacity to bring out and fight for the war.
5 0
3 years ago
How did the united states help rebuild european cities and increase prosperity at home after world war 2?
TEA [102]
It was the Marshall Plan
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Increased productivity most often leads to (1 point)
Maslowich
Increased productivity most often leads to "<span>a. higher standards of living", since in a workplace setting this would correlate in the long-term with more income, which can be spent on living materials. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
In what ways did the iranian revolution complicate our relationship with iran?
puteri [66]

Answer:

The Islamic Revolution in Iran made Iran to be an independent country instead of being a dependent on the USA. And even it made Iran to be a serious/giant obstacle on the interfering of the USA in the region, and likewise a huge obstacle on the way of USA’s profit. That's why there are complication between US and Iran!

<u>ITS JUST MY OPINION</u>

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the reasons Aztecs went to war?
    6·1 answer
  • How did the U.S. and the Soviet Union become Cold War adversaries?
    11·1 answer
  • What is the similarity of the land of ordinance of 1785 and the Northwest ordinance of 1787
    8·1 answer
  • One of Solomon's proverbs says: "Better is a dry morsel [of food] and quietness with it than a house full of feasting with strif
    10·1 answer
  • Some talk to me I’m bored
    7·2 answers
  • What American ethnic groups took part in the military during world war 2
    7·1 answer
  • When was muhammad born??
    9·1 answer
  • QUICK
    6·1 answer
  • Who led the continental army?
    12·2 answers
  • After being herded through “the
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!