Merck provides an example of what can happen if a company deviates from its : Core values
<h3>What are core values?</h3>
The core values of an organization are those values we hold, which form the foundation on which we perform work and conduct ourselves.
The core value of a company are those enduring principles that govern it's fundamental conduct towards attainment of it's goals. It is usually a passionate pledge on the principles that the organization stands for.
Hence, Merck provides an example of what can happen if a company deviates from its core values.
Learn more about core values here : brainly.com/question/14595106
Answer:
increase in the market value per share
Explanation:
Market value per share is the price that the share of a company can be traded if it is to be sold to a willing investor in a stock market.
The market value per share is determined by the company's financial performance, favorable market information concerning the enterprise, perceived future prospects plus investors or public confidence.
One of the goals of financial management is the maximization of the shareholders wealth, this will find expression in how the business actions or inaction of the management has enriched the shareholders.
The accident would likely be covered under the collision insurance, which covers the policyholder's car when it collides with another car or an object (in this case it would be an object since it was a single-vehicle accident.
If you only had liability coverage, the damage would likely not be covered because liability insurance only covers the damage caused to the other person and their car, not you or your car.
This will also be added to your insurance record even though you weren't the one driving because it was your vehicle and your policy.
Answer:
Ans. The average annual rate of return over the four years is 2.792%
Explanation:
Hi, first let´s introduce the formula to use
![r(Average)=\sqrt[n]{(1+r(1))*(1+r(2))*(1+r(3))+...(1+r(n))}-1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=r%28Average%29%3D%5Csqrt%5Bn%5D%7B%281%2Br%281%29%29%2A%281%2Br%282%29%29%2A%281%2Br%283%29%29%2B...%281%2Br%28n%29%29%7D-1)
Where:
r(1),(2),(3)...n are the returns in each period of time
n =number of returns to average (in our case, n=4).
With that in mind, let´s find the average annual return over this four years.
![r(Average)=\sqrt[4]{(1+0.025)*(1+0.025)*(1+0.12)+(1-0.07))} -1=0.022792](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=r%28Average%29%3D%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B%281%2B0.025%29%2A%281%2B0.025%29%2A%281%2B0.12%29%2B%281-0.07%29%29%7D%20-1%3D0.022792)
Therefore, the average annual return of this invesment in 4 years is 2.2792%
Best of luck.
Answer:
b. Place the company on a restricted list and give only factual information about the company.
Explanation:
There is an ethical problem in the scenario that borders on professional code of conducts in the area of objectivity and independence.
It was stated in the scenario that ''the head of the investment banking department has asked the head of the brokerage unit <u>to change the recommendation from "sell" to "buy."</u>
This is a case of wanting to interfere with the <u>objectivity</u> of the recommendations which should be based on <u>facts not bias</u>.
Secondly, the head of investment banking is trying to interfere with the <u>independence</u> of the head of brokerage unit.
According to the Standards, the head of the brokerage unit would be permitted to place the company on a restricted list and <u>give only factual information</u> about the company.
