Answer: The correct answer is "relative perfomance".
Explanation: According to Brynjolfsson and McAfee (2014), in winer-take-all markets, the compensation (e.g., revenues) is mainly determined by <u>relative perfomance.</u>
A type of market in which the winner takes everything clearly implies that the best competitors are those who take a large proportion of rewards while the worst little or nothing. To say that it is determined by their relative performance, refers to the subjects receiving rewards based on their performance in relation to the other competitors.
Considering the industrial context, the reasons some firms, industries, and cultures have different CSR thresholds than others include <u>differences in stages of </u><u>acceptance</u><u> </u><u>among</u><u> </u><u>firms</u><u>.</u>
Some other reasons some firms, industries, and cultures have different CSR thresholds than others include the following:
- Level of complexity
- CSR acceptance level of competition
- The difference in environments or countries
- Differences in cultures, etc.
CSR is the Corporate Social Responsibility in which the private firms seek to contribute to the society in which they operate through charity, philanthropic, and volunteering programs, amongst others.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that there are various reasons why some firms, industries, and cultures have different CSR thresholds than others.
Learn more about CSR thresholds here: brainly.com/question/15318875
Answer:
23.56
Explanation:
Standard deviation of the first stock (σ1) = 20%
Standard deviation of the second stock (σ2) = 37%
The correlation coefficient between the returns (ρ) = 0.1.
Proportion invested in the first stock (W1) = 43%
Proportion invested in the second stock (W2) = 57%
The standard deviation of a two-stock portfolio's returns is given by
The standard deviation of this portfolio's returns IS 23.56%
Hi there! The answer is C.
If you find yourself in a situation that you think might be escalation, you should avoid letting people know their issue is not part of your job. When telling people their concerns are not part of your job, it makes the chance of escalation rise.
You could try using options A, B and D in order to keep the involved people as content as possible.
