Answer:
Blocking the rays physically....
Explanation:
There have two ways that sunscreen protect minerals nanoparticles from uv radiations. Those are; blocking the rays physically
Absorbing them chemically.
Minerals powders are in nanoparticles from they come on clear without leaving much of white residue on skin
The statement 'phytochemicals may be guardians of our health, with concentrated extracts that provide protective benefits superior to whole foods' is False.
<h3>What are phytochemicals?</h3>
Phytochemicals are specific chemical substances extracted form plants that may confer curative properties to different types of diseases and conditions.
In conclusion, the statement 'phytochemicals may be guardians of our health, with concentrated extracts that provide protective benefits superior to whole foods' is False.
Complete question:
Phytochemicals may be guardians of our health, with the safety of consuming concentrated extracts that provide protective benefits superior to whole foods. True or False
Learn more about phytochemicals here:
brainly.com/question/14834940
#SPJ1
Vet tech assistant obtain and record patient case history, collect specimens, and perform lab procedures/equipment for surgery.
Valves are like flaps or lids that are used to transport blood from the atria to the ventricles. They act as inlets and outlets of blood.
Explanation:
The atrioventricular valves are located Left and right that are in the middle of atria and ventricle on both sides of the heart while two semilunar valves separate the right and left ventricles from the pulmonary valve and aortic valve.
The Atrioventricular valves are the mitral valve and the tricuspid valve. Mitral valve is in the left side and tricuspid valve is in the right. they both are separated by the atrium and ventricle
The two semilunar valves are the pulmonary valve and aortic valve. the pulmonary valve is on the right side separated by the right ventricle and pulmonary artery. The aortic valve is on the left and is separated by the left ventricle and aorta.
Answer:
One of the conditions that she describe
was induced heart failure, which is basically a “broken heart.” She says that human doctors apparently discovered that this is true in humans around 2000. However, veterinarians had recognized this in the earlier 1970s. This just goes to show that there are more correlations between the two than people realize and could help substantially.
Do you find Dr. Natterson-Horowitz's argument that physicians can learn a lot from veterinarians convincing? What part of her argument is, to you, especially strong or
weak?
I think that her argument is extremely convincing and I definitely agree with her. Her statements about how she performed
the same functions on both humans and other animals helped portray the argument she was making but was also a strong point. I also thought that her naming the three
conditions was very strong
Explanation:
