"Swift was satirizing the problems England faced establishing its colonial
<span>empire around the globe" would be the best option from the list, but there are others. </span>
Answer:
Explanation:
the answer is the 3rd choice. aia hope this helps you!
Answer:
Since the passage was not included, let me explain the types of point of view and its advantages. You can answer better by understanding the techniques.
Explanation:
Point of view refers to who is telling or narrating a story. A story can be told in three different ways: first person, second person, and third person. Writers use point of view to express the personal emotions of either themselves or their characters. The point of view of a story is how the writer wants to convey the experience to the reader.
First Person Point of view: With first-person point of view, the character is telling the story. You will see the words "I," "me," or "we" in first-person point of view. This point of view is commonly used for narratives and autobiographies.
Second Person Point of view: When writing in second-person point of view, the writer has the narrator speaking to the reader. The words "you," "your," and "yours" are used in this point of view. Some common uses for second-person point of view are directions, business writing, technical writing, song lyrics, speeches, and advertising.
Third Person Point of view: Third-person point of view has an external narrator telling the story. The words "he," "she," "it," or "they" are used in this point of view. This point of view can either be omniscient where the reader knows what all the characters are doing in the story or it can be limited to having the reader only know what is happening to one specific character.
It's D! I read this book last year and Cassie wants to gain her trust so she will tell her things and then later betray her.
Of the Constitution distributes the federal judicial power between the Supreme Court's appellate and original jurisdiction, providing that the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction in “all cases affecting ambassadors<span>, other public ministers and consuls,” </span>
