1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DaniilM [7]
3 years ago
6

If the plaintiff has either engaged in or refrained from actions that are at least partially to blame for the injuries received,

what negligence has occurred?If the plaintiff has either engaged in or refrained from actions that are at least partially to blame for the injuries received, what negligence has occurred?
History
1 answer:
timama [110]3 years ago
3 0

The correct action is B) contributory.

If the plaintiff has either engaged in or refrained from actions that are at least partially to blame for the injuries received, the negligence that has occurred is contributory.

The accepted definition of contributory negligence is when the plaintiff fails to exercise care for their safety and can minimize the compensation it can receive if the actions increase the possibility that the incident can occur again. This is one aspect that insurance companies pat close attention to because the company tries to examine the situation to pay less of the insurance.

The other options of the question were A) tortious, C) absolute, and D) prejudicial.

You might be interested in
Who ruled Rome after the death of Julius Caesar?
Alisiya [41]
Augustus took Julius Caesars place
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were sports becoming more popular both at the high school and college level and at the
alex41 [277]

Answer:

because adults didn't trust boys to play unsupervised, attention soon shifted to organized sports. Sports were seen as important in teaching the “American” values of cooperation, hard work, and respect for authority.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
how did the signing of the magna carta affect the lives of ordinary townspeople of the 13th century? a. it allowed them the oppo
Dafna11 [192]
<span>D) It provided the same rights to ordinary townspeople as those held by barons, lords, and other wealthy noblemen. It basically guaranteed the right that all people would have equal rights and stand chance in court without bias-ism.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did Japan want when they invaded china
MrMuchimi

Answer:

for control of the Chinese mainland

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Instructions:Select the correct answer.
ryzh [129]
2. Crusaders murdered Jews. Muslims, and Christians during their journey.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The major obstacle to islamic expansion in india was the presence of the
    5·1 answer
  • How is Anne Frank funny​
    12·2 answers
  • Which of these is true about Cecil Calvert
    13·1 answer
  • Which industry emerged directly of the farming industry in Texas
    13·1 answer
  • Which Bill of Rights protection has not been incorporated into the Fourteenth Amendment so that it applies to the states?
    14·2 answers
  • I got this wrong but I have the same answer as everyone else. Need someone to confirm.
    13·1 answer
  • History question HELP!!
    10·2 answers
  • The 1st Amendment allowed for
    10·2 answers
  • What do you know about John Brown? What was his goal and what became of him?
    7·1 answer
  • Who invented the incandescent light bulb?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!