Answer:
by making sure prisoners are not denied access to basic need such as food, warmth, or exercise
Explanation:
Created by the U.S. Supreme Court, the "identifiable human needs" standard requires prison officials to comply with the Eighth Amendment by <u>making sure prisoners are not denied access to basic need such as food, warmth, or exercise.
</u>
The Supreme Court has created two standards to be used by the courts in determining whether a prisoner's Eighth Amendment protections against cruel and unusual punishment have been violated. The standards are; the "deliberate indifference" standard, and the "identifiable human needs" standard, under the identifiable human needs standards prison officials must ensure prisoners are not denied access to basic need such as food, warmth, or exercise.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The practitioner must separately date and time his or her signature authenticating an entry, even though there may be a date and time already on the document, because the latter may not reflect when the entry was authenticated:True
Answer:
A testable proposition.
Explanation:
A hypothesis is one of the tools in working in different academic settings. It is used in the both science, social science and art fields.
It is defined here to be simply a proposition that is testable or it can also be defined as a proposition, or set of propositions, set forth as an explanation for the occurrence of some specified group of phenomena, which is either asserted merely as a provisional conjecture to guide investigation or accepted as highly probable in the light of established facts.
In societies that practice matrilineal descent, a man
belongs to the same descent group as his sister’s son.
To add, in a matrilineal descent system, an
individual is considered to belong to the same descent group as her
or his mother. <span>The tracing of descent via
the female line is called matrilineality.</span>
Answer: be irrelevant to the justice or injustice of capital punishment.
Explanation:
From the information given, Banks was charged with murder but his lawyer failed to vigorously cross-examine an informant testifying against Banks or to investigate the case.
Based on the above, since Banks may not have received a fair trial because of poor representation, then a retentionist would argue that the injustice in the conduct of the trial would be irrelevant to the justice or injustice of capital punishment.
