When having pride of a certain country, it is called nationalism.
Too much nationalism can cause problems, one of the causes of WW1 was nationalism.
Answer:
In this scenario, Greg's actions exemplify social loafing.
Explanation:
Greg's action are exemplifying the term social loafing. In social psychology, social loafing is used to refer to individuals who, when working in groups, exert less effort. It offers an explanation as to why some groups can be inefficient. There are people who present this tendency to not work hard when they know others are working. They are less effective and productive when working in a group than they are when working by themselves and when they are responsible for their own results and productivity.
Answer:
Explanation:
Classes is a process in which people are grouped into a set of hierarchical social categories.
Class separate some set of people from the other, those who are of high class often have access to various things which include education, good placement in employment, good and quality schools for their children where they could learn. The low class set of people often manage the amenities provided by government and what they could afford themselves.
Classes brings about a difference among people of a group, though they have equal right to a thing it is the person who is dim fit that takes the opportunity.
We all have the right to speak when cheated, we can go to court to file a law suit but not everyone has the knowledge of what the court can do and some are constantly cheated without help.
A political appointment can only be given to the knowledgeable which means some class will have the opportunity while some wouldn't
The correct answer is conscious experience
This conscious experience, according to Titchener, is dependent on the individual who experiences it, differing from that studied by scientists from other areas. For example, both Physics and Psychology are able to study light or sound, however, each professional will have different guidance, methods and objectives.
Physicists examine the phenomena from the point of view of the physical processes involved, while psychologists analyze the same phenomena based on the experience and personal observation of those who experience them. The other sciences do not depend on the personal experience of the subject who observes a phenomenon, nor on his description of the feelings involved. They just observe and report the results.