A tort, in common law jurisdiction, is a civil wrong that causes a claimant to suffer loss or harm, resulting in legal liability for the person who commits a tortious act. It can include the intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence, financial losses, injuries, invasion of privacy and many other things.
i googled “tort law is generally based on what?” and this is all that came up so idk if that helps or if you still need help with that
Courts applying the Davis exception most often summarize it with phrases such as "ongoing emergency" or "emergency situation." When police are responding to an ongoing emergency, their motive is to ensure the safety of all concerned, not to collect evidence. The Supreme Court ruled in Davis that statements elicited by police while responding to an ongoing emergency are not testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause.
Testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:
-ITlooks like the kind of testimony that would be offered at trial in aid of prosecution;
-It is made when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no ongoing emergency; and
-The primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to a later criminal prosecution.
The Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution protects the right of a criminal defendant to be confronted by his or her accusers in Court and to cross-examine any testimony that they may offer. The admission of hearsay (an out-of-court statement) – even if admissible under an exception to the rule against hearsay – can be in direct conflict with the right of Confrontation.
On the other hand, “non-testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:
-It is made primarily for the purpose of assisting police to meet an ongoing emergency; or
-It was made primarily for a purpose other than discovering, establishing or proving past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.
To learn more about Testimony visit here ; brainly.com/question/29244222?referrer=searchResultssearchResults
#SPJ4
A & C, terrorists have political goals and thrive to impact the public. They don’t harm others just to hurt them without any reason.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
There were six editions of the Standard Juvenile Court Act. It was then revised in 1959. Hope it helps!
Answer:
One of the findings was that it was possible to see that prisons were able to reduce the level of violence against women.
Explanation:
The Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment sought to stipulate which punishment was most effective in decreasing cases of domestic violence. For this, they will observe the effects of arrests, mediations and separations in incidents of domestic violence, applied to a group of offenders convicted of this type of crime. During the evaluation of the results, it was observed that prisons were more effective in decreasing the rate of repeated domestic violence against women, as offenders who were arrested had the lowest rate of recidivism of domestic violence, in contrast to other punishments.
