Answer:
comparing samples ———> compound
Identifying drugs ———> infrared
Examining documents ———> stereo
Analyzing paint pigments ———> electron
Explanation: I just did the mastery test
The answer is B because i just took the test
Answer:
concurring
Explanation:
a concurring opinion is in certain legal systems a written opinion by one or more judges of a court which agrees with the decision made by the majority of the court, but states different or additional reasons as the basis for their decision.
The fallacy used by the teacher is called the fallacy of false causality.
<h3>How is this fallacy established?</h3>
- The fallacy of false chance establishes a relation between two elements.
- This relationship is false and does not present any type of interaction.
The fallacy of false causality establishes two elements in a cause-and-effect relationship, however, this relationship is false.
This can be seen in the statement made by the professor, where he shows that the passage of planes is responsible for the hot weather. However, the increase in temperature is caused by weather factors that are not influenced by airplanes.
Therefore, there is no cause-and-effect relationship between the planes and the climate of the region, which shows that this statement is incorrect.
Learn more about fallacies:
brainly.com/question/1178948
#SPJ1
