1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anarel [89]
3 years ago
6

Do you think the United Nations should establish a nonproliferation treaty for other types of weapons, such as chemical and biol

ogical? If so, what sanctions should be imposed on countries that refuse to sign it?
History
2 answers:
bulgar [2K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Although the Geneva protocol already exists in which the use of chemical or biological weapons for the states that signed it has been banned since 1925 and today there are about 137 countries that have accepted the same treaty, <u>it is a bit of concern that the treaty focuses solely on its use and not on its manufacture and storage</u>, which at the time of a war would be used since it is already available, I believe that it is very necessary that the United Nations elaborate a treaty where manufacturing is strictly prohibited , storage, sale and other activities with this type of weapons and those who infringe it could receive the following sanctions:

  1. <u>Withdrawal from the offending country of the United Nations</u>, so that country will no longer have a voice or vote in the decisions taken by this entity.
  2. <u>The countries adhering to the treaty cut diplomatic and mercantile relations</u>, not only with the offending country, but with all the companies or branches that are there, which exerts a very strong political and economic pressure, not only external but also internal.

Explanation:

Avoiding the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is logical from the point of view of human preservation, currently the technology would allow the creation of devastating weapons that could kill entire countries and prevent these events from happening and protect the lives of innocent people should be the engine of rulers and international entities such as the United Nations.

devlian [24]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

There is alredy a treaty called Geneva Gas Protocol that banned the use of these weapons

The Geneva Gas Protocol, in full Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, in international law, treaty signed in 1925 by most of the world’s countries banning the use of chemical and biological weapons in warfare. It was drafted at the 1925 Geneva Conference as part of a series of measures designed to avoid repetition of the atrocities committed by the belligerents in World War I.

The problem is that it is difficult to implement but a good measure would be very high fines to the countries that produce or stockpile these weapons.

You might be interested in
Building a railroad from the coast of Kenya inland led to the importance of..
weqwewe [10]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

issbusnsjsbsjdbdjshsjsbsbshshshsbhsbsbehsbshebehshebsbshbssbbshsebbeshbe

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements is FALSE?
kvasek [131]

I would say it is C.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does the federal justice system promote the constitutional principle of rule of law?
allochka39001 [22]

Constitutional principle of rule of law dictates that  all individuals, institutions and organizations (whether its privately held or publicly held), Even the State itself, are accountable to laws. No matter what ethnicity or social status that a person has, that person need to face equal treatment of the law like any others. 5.0


3 0
3 years ago
See picture below!!! :D
Lorico [155]
I believe it is B)
happy to assist you!
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP ME FAST ILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST IF ITS GOOD
sp2606 [1]

Answer:

                  The number one cost is the amount of lives lost. At least 600,000 people died during the civil war. A human life has no price. So no other cost comes close to the amount of deaths that occurred because of the grueseom civil war. (I DONT HAVE THE ANALYZE IT PASSAGE SO I CAN'T PUT QUOTES.)            

       The war was costlier for the North. Even though they won, and they got what they wanted. And the south lost their slaves, the North paid way more in human lives. (Add quotes. If you don't have differences in human lives lost, just mention slaves were lost by south)

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What do the characters of the wizard of oz represent in history
    14·1 answer
  • what is the term for belief that the united states was meant to expand from atlantic ocean to the specific ocean
    8·1 answer
  • When did japan's ports open?
    5·2 answers
  • What similarities did the movement for the abolition of slavery share with the feminist movement in the nineteenth century?
    6·1 answer
  • How did the american public respond during the iran hostage crisis?
    12·2 answers
  • What is 48,100,000,000,000 in scientific notation?
    11·1 answer
  • To abandon one's country or cause in favor of an opposing one?
    8·1 answer
  • C Who united Europe by declaring a religious war against the Muslim Turks who occupied the holy land?​
    14·2 answers
  • Click to review the online content. Then answer the question(s) below, using complete sentences. Scroll down to view additional
    9·1 answer
  • Describe the resources and transportation system in Great Britain.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!