1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anarel [89]
3 years ago
6

Do you think the United Nations should establish a nonproliferation treaty for other types of weapons, such as chemical and biol

ogical? If so, what sanctions should be imposed on countries that refuse to sign it?
History
2 answers:
bulgar [2K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Although the Geneva protocol already exists in which the use of chemical or biological weapons for the states that signed it has been banned since 1925 and today there are about 137 countries that have accepted the same treaty, <u>it is a bit of concern that the treaty focuses solely on its use and not on its manufacture and storage</u>, which at the time of a war would be used since it is already available, I believe that it is very necessary that the United Nations elaborate a treaty where manufacturing is strictly prohibited , storage, sale and other activities with this type of weapons and those who infringe it could receive the following sanctions:

  1. <u>Withdrawal from the offending country of the United Nations</u>, so that country will no longer have a voice or vote in the decisions taken by this entity.
  2. <u>The countries adhering to the treaty cut diplomatic and mercantile relations</u>, not only with the offending country, but with all the companies or branches that are there, which exerts a very strong political and economic pressure, not only external but also internal.

Explanation:

Avoiding the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is logical from the point of view of human preservation, currently the technology would allow the creation of devastating weapons that could kill entire countries and prevent these events from happening and protect the lives of innocent people should be the engine of rulers and international entities such as the United Nations.

devlian [24]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

There is alredy a treaty called Geneva Gas Protocol that banned the use of these weapons

The Geneva Gas Protocol, in full Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, in international law, treaty signed in 1925 by most of the world’s countries banning the use of chemical and biological weapons in warfare. It was drafted at the 1925 Geneva Conference as part of a series of measures designed to avoid repetition of the atrocities committed by the belligerents in World War I.

The problem is that it is difficult to implement but a good measure would be very high fines to the countries that produce or stockpile these weapons.

You might be interested in
Read the following passage , which early river valley civilization does it describes ?
puteri [66]

Answer:

I believe China, or Yellow River civilization.

4 0
3 years ago
The largest city in Brazil, Sao Paulo, has a population of about 11 million. Based on the rank-size rule, what is the population
lianna [129]

Answer:

b:5-6 million

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do Madison's checks work? Is the fact that they "clog the administration" a good thing? Why or why not?
Sveta_85 [38]
<span>Madison didn’t originate the idea of checks and balances for limiting government power, but he helped push it farther than anyone else before or since. Previous political thinkers, citing British experience, had talked about checks and balances with a monarch in the mix, but Madison helped apply the principle to a republic. Contrary to such respected thinkers as Baron de Montesquieu, Madison insisted checks and balances could help protect liberty in a large republic. AMONG the numerous advantages promised by a well constructed Union, none deserves to be more accurately developed than its tendency to break and control the violence of faction. The friend of popular governments never finds himself so much alarmed for their character and fate, as when he contemplates their propensity to this dangerous vice. He will not fail, therefore, to set a due value on any plan which, without violating the principles to which he is attached, provides a proper cure for it. The instability, injustice, and confusion introduced into the public councils, have, in truth, been the mortal diseases under which popular governments have everywhere perished; as they continue to be the favorite and fruitful topics from which the adversaries to liberty derive their most specious declamations. The valuable improvements made by the American constitutions on the popular models, both ancient and modern, cannot certainly be too much admired; but it would be an unwarrantable partiality, to contend that they have as effectually obviated the danger on this side, as was wished and expected. Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith, and of public and personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable, that the public good is disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties, and that measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority. However anxiously we may wish that these complaints had no foundation, the evidence, of known facts will not permit us to deny that they are in some degree true. It will be found, indeed, on a candid review of our situation, that some of the distresses under which we labor have been erroneously charged on the operation of our governments; but it will be found, at the same time, that other causes will not alone account for many of our heaviest misfortunes; and, particularly, for that prevailing and increasing distrust of public engagements, and alarm for private rights, which are echoed from one end of the continent to the other. These must be chiefly, if not wholly, effects of the unsteadiness and injustice with which a factious spirit has tainted our public administrations.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Aztec civilization, Roman Empire, reign of the czars in Russia. What were 2 similarites between them?
ch4aika [34]
- they were using violence to reign
- huge military resources 
- used religion to establish their positions as rulers
7 0
3 years ago
PleAse Help ME...............
igomit [66]

Answer: your mom

Explanation: because

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The oldest district in the north american manufacturing belt is
    5·1 answer
  • Why did the British allow the colonies to be self-governing? How did the decision lead to future
    15·1 answer
  • Compare judicial activism with judicial restraint, including how each philosophy interprets the Constitution. Explain at least o
    10·2 answers
  • Why did some people oppose the Immigration Act of 1965?
    5·1 answer
  • What are some pros and cons of the two theories represented in this activity regarding the peopling of the Americas?
    8·1 answer
  • What was el greco movement of art
    14·1 answer
  • What are the blanks?
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST !!!!!
    15·2 answers
  • Which political philosophy is best supported by both documents?
    10·1 answer
  • Andrew Johnson's plan for national reconstruction: Group of answer choices called for freed slaves to be given back to their whi
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!