The correct answer is A. Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Explanation:
In a Post hoc ergo proper hoc fallacy the speaker considers one event is the cause of another because one event follows the other in time. This implies the speaker incorrectly assumes one event to be the cause of another without real evidence. This occurs in the example presented because the speaker thinks Jalessa being a President is the cause that the school was broken into. However, there is no evidence Jalessa is the direct cause of this event and this cannot be concluded based on the fact the incident occurred after Jalessa became the class president.
Answer: is 4
Explanation: The answer is 4 because once you read it in the last sentence it states Egyptians, the act also threatened the pharaoh’s afterlife. so the answer is 4. None of the pharaohs would experience an eternal afterlife.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
A because "Because she was too young" can't stand by itself. To test if it is dependent, see if it makes sense by itself. if it does, it is independent.
Answer:
Fast food, sugar, alcohol, greasy food, etc
Explanation:
things that wouldnt be good for you aren’t good for your hair either
