Answer:
Ancient Greeks and Romans have influenced every part of the modern world. Modern governments echo what the Greeks and Romans Practiced thousands of years ago. Buildings today mimic the arches, domes, pillars, and vaulted ceilings first seen in ancient Greek and Roman architecture. Many mathematical concepts in school textbooks today were conceived by ancient Greek and Roman Scholars. We even owe entire fields of study, such as philosophy, to ancient Greek thinkers.
Explanation:
I hope this helped! :)
Answer:
The answer is "Feel badly about herself but be motivated to play well".
Explanation:
The social contrast happens when they compete with those who they think are more important than all of us these upward correlations are often pointed at improving the present position or level of capacity. This can compare ourselves better with someone and find means of attaining similar outcomes referring to others, who are worse off than themselves, in downward prosocial behavior. These downwards correlations also focus on making our skills or traits feel good. For the analysis, it has been determined the upward comparisons appear and to make us feel better, whereas the upward social influence appears to drive us even more or greater.
More and more people moved westward to claim lands that were once inhabited by Native Americans. This was encouraged by the government. This also led to several conflicts with Indians that would later lead to a war between the Indians and U.S. army. In the end, the west was completely settled completing the U.S. expansion to that area.
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
