Answer:
It takes specialized training to become both a police officer and a judge.
Explanation:
In the sentence "Similarly, both require specialized training before a job can be obtained", it says exactly the answer, and then there's the sentence
"However, it takes much **longer** to become a judge than it does a police officer", that automatically crosses out the option "It takes the same amount of time to become a police officer and a judge."
It can't be the option "Police officers and judges earn similar yearly wages and benefits." Because of the sentence "and a judge can expect to make more money."
In the text, there is an sentence that would trick some people into believing that it's the option, "Judges and police officers both play roles in the legal system." this is the sentence in the text "Although they are both trained to uphold the law, the role each plays in the legal system is very different." It wouldn't be it because sure it says that they play a role in it, but no where does it say they both play a role, and it's irrelevant to the question.
The correct answer is:
<span>C. To help persuade your audience that you are correct.</span>
The propaganda technique that is an attempt to support a statement by simply repeating the statement in different or stringer more stringent terms is Circular reasoning.
<h3>What is Circular reasoning?</h3>
A logical mistake called circular reasoning, commonly referred to as circular logic, occurs when the reasoner starts with the conclusion they want to reach. Since the conclusion must be true if the premises are true, circular arguments are frequently logically sound. Circular reasoning, which occurs when the premises of an argument require just as much support or evidence as the conclusion does, is not a formal logical fallacy but rather a pragmatic flaw that prevents an argument from persuading. Other ways to say this include saying that there is no reason to believe the premises unless you already believe the conclusion, or that the premises don't offer any independent support for the conclusion.
A common example of circular reasoning is "A is true because B is true; B is true because A is true." If the circularity comprises a lengthy chain of premises, it may be challenging to identify.
To learn more about circular reasoning with the help of given link:
brainly.com/question/16153777
#SPJ4
"It is an inhuman task to make all of these decisions correctly." The author is furthering the idea that perfect parenting isn't possible, as stated in the first sentence.
