1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pentagon [3]
3 years ago
11

Which aspect of English government traditions did not influence leaders in the United States?

History
1 answer:
Gekata [30.6K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The United States did not want a central government which was powerful. After the independence from the British, the American leaders did not want another powerful and strong government to hold them.

Explanation:

When United States got freedom from the British, their main concern was that they need to form a government which is centralised and small rather than a government which is vast.

It took from the British and learned that having a vast and big government can cause problems for later on. The Americans did not want anyone to interfere in their land and property. So they created laws which regulated a small central government which was not extensive.

You might be interested in
Which statement best explains the consequences of the decisions made at the Berlin conference of 1884
kow [346]

The Berlin Conference of 1884–1885 indicates the European competition for territory in Africa. It was also known as the <u>Congo Conference</u> or <u>West African Conference</u> and it was organized by Otto von Bismarck, first Chancellor of Germany.

During the 1870s and early 1880s Great Britain, France, Germany, and others began looking to Africa for natural resources as well as a potential market for the goods these factories produced.

The Scramble for Africa, which was the name given to the event of the occupation, division, and colonization of African territory by European powers,  led to conflict among these powers, particularly between the British and French in West Africa; Egypt; the Portuguese and British in East Africa; and the French and King Leopold II in central Africa. The competition between Great Britain and France led Bismarck to take action, and in late 1884 he called a meeting of European powers in Berlin.

In consecutive meetings, Great Britain, France, Germany, Portugal, and King Leopold II negotiated their requests to African territory, and they were then formalized and mapped. During the conference the leaders also agreed to allow free trade among the colonies and established a structure for them to negotiate future European claims in Africa.

As a result of the Berlin Conference: The Congo Free State was confirmed as the private ownership of “Congo Society”. Consequently, the territory of the Democratic Republic of Congo today. Also, nearly 2 million square kilometers passed into the hands of King Leopold II and it late became a Belgian colony.

The 14 signatory powers mentioned above have free trade across the Congo River basin and Lake Malawi. And the Niger and Congo rivers were free transit of ships.  

It was also a signed by the states an international prohibition to abolish the slave trade.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were the tryants say to citizensable to zeize control in athens?
satela [25.4K]
The tyrants were able to seize control in Athens because they had the backing of the common people
7 0
3 years ago
The U.S. Supreme Court case plessy v.Ferguson determined fbT segregation was acceptable under the condition
o-na [289]

In Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that facilities that were "separate but equal" were permissible under the US Constitution.

This allowed the Jim Crow laws to develop wherein African Americans went to different schools, ate at different restaurants or in different sections, and were generally segregated from the population

6 0
3 years ago
Who was the first South African president?​
Virty [35]
Is it Nelson Mandela
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why would japan have had reason to resent the five power naval treaty of 1922?
mestny [16]
It allowed them fewer ships than the US and Britain limiting the kind of parity they hoped to have on the world stage in terms of naval power. One of the arguments went that the US and Britain had to have larger navies because of their need to maintain a force in more than one operating theater while the Japanese only had to worry about their side of the Pacific. It wasn't something that made a number of hardcore military types within the Japanese leadership very happy, but they ended up signing the treaty anyway (though refused to renew it in the 1930s).
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In the 1850s, who was the other party in Dred Scott’s court case? his owner Sandford his owner’s widow his enslaved worker the s
    8·2 answers
  • What did Madame de staël say are Napoleons only methods of persuasion?
    9·1 answer
  • The highest court in the state Florida is the Florida Supreme court U.S Supreme court U.S County court Florida County court
    14·2 answers
  • Why did social inequality intensify in Europe during the Industrial Revolution? What effects did this change have? (4 points)
    6·1 answer
  • Why did the united states deckare war on great britain 1812?
    13·1 answer
  • Radical republicans felt that in order for southern states to write new state constitutions the must
    5·1 answer
  • What was the What were the goals of Huey Long’s Share Our Wealth program? Check all that apply.
    10·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE!!!
    10·1 answer
  • What president was elected with an overwhelming majority of electoral votes in 1980?
    11·1 answer
  • The views of Malcolm X differed with
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!