Answer:
The correct answer is b generation effect
Explanation:
It is the name of the research Generation effect (delineation of a phenomena) that was done by Norman Slamecka and Peter Graf in the University of Toronto, Toronto Canada. It was tested on 24 volunteer students of introductory physiology in which each student was given 100 items separated by cards each card presented a word and the initial letter of the response e. g. (rapid-f). The participants were given five rules 1. Associate (lamp-light) 2. Category (Ruby-diamond) 3. Opposite (Long- short) 4. Synonym (sea-ocean) 5. Rhyme (save-cave), the students were given blocks of 20 cards with a new rule each time. Then 12 of the participants were tested again later and the results do not pointed significantly to the generation effect in the third experimentation with 24 participants divided this way 12(informed participants) and 12 (uninformed participants) The results had a clear cut and pointed to the generation effect. After five experiments there was established the existence of the phenomena in which when a word was generated in the presence of a stimulus and an encoding rule it was better remembered than when the same word was simply read under those conditions (Slamecka & Graf 1978).
<span>In discussing androgyny, Sandra Bem can clearly be seen as talking about both gender roles and gender identities that are involved in this regard. In doing so, she believes that both have an equal impact on the capabilities and opportunities provided to androgynous individuals in society.</span>
Answer:
B). Able to successfully sue the reporter for intrusion if the homeowner did not give the reporter permission to be in the house.
Explanation:
As per the given description, the homeowner would probably be 'able to sue the reporter successfully for intruding if the homeowner himself didn't allow the reporter to be present in the house' as the reporter entered the house without the permission of the home's owner but rather entered with the permission of the firefighters. Since the house belongs to the owner he/she possess the legal rights to sue any person for intrusion who has engulfed his/her house without prior permission. Therefore, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
<em>The right which is believed to belong to every person is called human rights.</em>
Answer:
Option B. Not be approved because he has violated the ethical standard of confidentiality/privacy.
Explanation:
The ethical standard of confidentiality refers to protect the information that has been shared within the included group.
Under this, the one has a duty that the individual should not theft or pass on the information and data to the entity which has not been allowed to have access to the information.
Here the John has asked for the names of the participants which as an act that violates the ethical standard of confidentiality/privacy i.e he has acquired the data that has been provided so that the participant identity is private.
