1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ipatiy [6.2K]
3 years ago
9

During the late 19th century, some United States newspapers printed exaggerated accounts of Spanish cruelty in Cuba. These repor

ts helped to bring about the Spanish-American War primarily by
A. encouraging the formation of Spanish revolutionary groups
B. alienating the Spanish government
C. arousing public opinion against Spain
D. provoking the anger of the business community
History
1 answer:
lorasvet [3.4K]3 years ago
6 0
The answer would be A because they made them so mad that they might want to start a war.
You might be interested in
What does NATO stand for and what is the purpose of this organization?​
Elina [12.6K]

Answer:

NATO stands for North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

Explanation:

It was formed in 1949 to provide collective security against the threat posed by the Soviet Union.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did colonist in the 1600's provide for their basic needs?<br> please help!!!???
Brrunno [24]

Answer:

When the London Company sent out its first expedition to begin colonizing Virginia on December 20, 1606, it was by no means the first European attempt to exploit North America. In 1564, for example, French Protestants (Huguenots) built a colony near what is now Jacksonville, Florida. This intrusion did not go unnoticed by the Spanish, who had previously claimed the region. The next year, the Spanish established a military post at St. Augustine; Spanish troops soon wiped out the French interlopers residing but 40 miles away.

Meanwhile, Basque, English, and French fishing fleets became regular visitors to the coasts from Newfoundland to Cape Cod. Some of these fishing fleets even set up semi-permanent camps on the coasts to dry their catches and to trade with local Indians, exchanging furs for manufactured goods. For the next two decades, Europeans' presence in North America was limited to these semi-permanent incursions. Then in the 1580s, the English tried to plant a permanent colony on Roanoke Island (on the outer banks of present-day North Carolina), but their effort was short-lived.

In the early 1600s, in rapid succession, the English began a colony (Jamestown) in Chesapeake Bay in 1607, the French built Quebec in 1608, and the Dutch began their interest in the region that became present-day New York. Within another generation, the Plymouth Company (1620), the Massachusetts Bay Company (1629), the Company of New France (1627), and the Dutch West India Company (1621) began to send thousands of colonists, including families, to North America. Successful colonization was not inevitable. Rather, interest in North America was a halting, yet global, contest among European powers to exploit these lands.

There is another very important point to keep in mind:  European colonization and settlement of North America (and other areas of the so-called "new world") was an invasion of territory controlled and settled for centuries by Native Americans. To be sure, Indian control and settlement of that land looked different to European, as compared to Indian, eyes. Nonetheless, Indian groups perceived the Europeans' arrival as an encroachment and they pursued any number of avenues to deal with that invasion. That the Indians were unsuccessful in the long run in resisting or in establishing a more favorable accommodation with the Europeans was as much the result of the impact on Indians of European diseases as superior force of arms. Moreover, to view the situation from Indian perspectives ("facing east from Indian country," in historian Daniel K. Richter's wonderful phrase) is essential in understanding the complex interaction of these very different peoples.

Finally, it is also important to keep in mind that yet a third group of people--in this case Africans--played an active role in the European invasion (or colonization) of the western hemisphere. From the very beginning, Europeans' attempts to establish colonies in the western hemisphere foundered on the lack of laborers to do the hard work of colony-building. The Spanish, for example, enslaved the Indians in regions under their control. The English struck upon the idea of indentured servitude to solve the labor problem in Virginia. Virtually all the European powers eventually turned to African slavery to provide labor on their islands in the West Indies. Slavery was eventually transferred to other colonies in both South and North America.

Because of the interactions of these very diverse peoples, the process of European colonization of the western hemisphere was a complex one, indeed. Individual members of each group confronted situations that were most often not of their own making or choosing. These individuals responded with the means available to them. For most, these means were not sufficient to prevail. Yet these people were not simply victims; they were active agents trying to shape their own destinies. That many of them failed should not detract from their efforts.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Is it bad for America that so few of the things we buy are made here?
irinina [24]
No, American manufacturers have been sourcing products and parts from around the world for decades, and today it is nearly impossible (and not to mention extremely expensive) for companies to attempt to extract themselves from the global supply chain.
7 0
3 years ago
Why was john dean’s testimony against president nixon so damaging? dean had been a lawyer for two of the watergate burglars. dea
bonufazy [111]

John dean’s testimony against President Nixon was damaging because he have been an important official in the White House.

<h3>What is the testimony about?</h3>

As an official in the White house, he gave a testimony in relation to the Watergate scandal that Nikon was accused for during his election campaign,

Hence, his testimony was damaging because he have been an important official in the White House.

Therefore, the Option B is correct.

Read more about Watergate scandal

<em>brainly.com/question/1687216</em>

3 0
2 years ago
What was Aphrodite's birth and infancy as a baby
MissTica
There are several myths regarding the birth of Aphrodite. Here are the the most accepted origins of the goddess.
First: She is thought to be the daughter of Zeus and the titaness Dione
<span>Second: She rose out of Uranus' private parts when Cronus cut it off.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is it difficult for Americans to understand African aesthetics towards dance ?
    13·1 answer
  • Is it possible for smart phones to be hacked to cyber bully private U.S. citizens by hackers and government employees, and how w
    9·1 answer
  • What did the New Nationalism program support? It favored consolidation of trusts and labor unions. It favored small enterprise a
    11·1 answer
  • The viewpoint toward Muslim slaves in this account is best described by which of these statements?
    13·2 answers
  • I NEED HELP ASAP!
    11·1 answer
  • The internal combustion engine was an innovation of:
    6·1 answer
  • What were 4 effects of the end of the Cold War?
    13·1 answer
  • What is an initiative? <br> A. <br> B. <br> C.<br> D.
    15·1 answer
  • Why did the United States join World War I on the side of the Allies against German?
    11·1 answer
  • How did Thomas Paine's Common Sense influence the Deceleration of Independence
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!