Answer: yes
Explanation:
Power is an entity's or individual's ability to control or direct others, while authority is influence that is predicated on perceived legitimacy. Consequently, power is necessary for authority, but it is possible to have power without authority. In other words, power is necessary but not sufficient for authority.
The president because he can veto a bill he cant pass a bill
The correct answer is True
Rationalism was a very important philosophical current in Modernity. As a conception of philosophical knowledge, rationalism began to take shape during the Renaissance, but its early origins can go back to Greek philosophy, with the Platonic idealist theses and the conception of the principle of causality.
The main objective of rationalism is to theorize the way of knowing about human beings, not accepting any empirical element as a source of true knowledge. For the rationalists, all the ideas we have originate from pure rationality, which also imposes an innate conception, that is, that the ideas have innate origins in the human being, being born with us in our intellect and being used and discovered by the people who they make better use of reason. Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz are considered rationalist philosophers.
The Articles of Confederation were replaced by the US Constitution because the federal government had almost no power. Since the federal government had almost no power, very few new laws were passed and the US could not raise a strong army to put down Shay's Rebellion.
When creating the Articles of Confederation, framers feared giving the central (aka federal) government too much power. This was based on America's experience with a "tyrannical" central government when they were under British rule. This is why the Articles of Confederation does not give the federal government the right to tax and needs 13 out of 13 states in order to add an amendment.
