1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nata [24]
3 years ago
11

List and explain the major types of legal defenses.

Law
1 answer:
sertanlavr [38]3 years ago
8 0

1. Innocence

One of the simplest defenses to criminal liability is the defense of innocence. This defense is raised when you did not commit the crime. Remember, the prosecution has to prove every element of the crime charged against you and prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.

2. Constitutional Violations

These are types of criminal defenses used in criminal trials and involve the way evidence was collected by police and other law enforcement. Don’t miss these important defenses, because they could result in dismissal of the

prosecution’s entire case.

3.Alibi

Certain types of defenses in criminal law, such as the alibi defense, are affirmative defenses. This means the defendant (you) must prove the defense, and in the case of an alibi, it means that the defendant must prove that he or she was somewhere other than the scene of the crime at the time of the crime.

4. Insanity

The insanity defense, which you may hear about all the time in tv courtroom dramas, is used infrequently for a few reasons. The first is the insanity defense is another affirmative defense, which requires that the defendant prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he or she was suffering a severe mental disease or defect at the time the crime was committed.

5. Self-Defense

The defense of self-defense may be raised for crimes like assault, battery, and murder, where the defendant used violence in a justified way to respond to violent actions or the threat of violent actions coming from the victim.

6. Defense-of-Others

Like self-defense, another defense involving justified use of force or violence is the defense-of-others defense.

7. Defense-of-Property

Similar to self-defense and the defense-of-others, the defense-of-property defense may be raised where the defendant used force or violence to protect property, such as land or items, from damage or destruction. This defense has an additional limitation, in that the amount of force used to protect property can never be lethal.

8. Involuntary Intoxication

Involuntary intoxication is a lack of intent defense. If the defendant was in a state where he or she did not know what they were doing due to intoxication, this defense cancels out the intent aspect of most crimes.

9. Voluntary Intoxication

Unlike involuntary intoxication, getting drunk or high deliberately and then committing a crime will not stand as a valid defense.

10. Mistake of Law / Mistake of Fact

Sometimes, a defendant may have been unaware of a fundamental element of a crime that the prosecution has charged him with. For example, if a defendant is charged with stealing a car, but believed his family member or friend wanted to give him the car, a mistake defense would exist.

11. Duress or Coercion

This defense involves someone else threatening to use force or violence to get you to do something against your better judgment. Essentially, it means you were forced to commit a crime.

12. Abandonment / Withdrawal

This defense can be raised when a defendant initially intended to commit a crime or participate in a crime but had a change of heart and withdrew from participation.

13. Necessity

This is defense that applies where the defendant committed a crime to prevent a more significant harm from happening. For example, the defendant stole a car to drive a gunshot victim to the hospital or stole food to feed his starving family. The defense would not apply if the same defendant stole the car to take a vacation or stole laptops from an electronics store during a riot.

14. Statute of Limitations

This is a procedural defense. Sometimes, a certain crime will have a specific window of time in which it can be brought by the prosecution. If the window closes, the statute of limitations may bar the prosecution from bringing the case.

You might be interested in
Should Congress have the power to refuse to vote on a justice nominee? Why or why not?
Shkiper50 [21]

Answer:

It is the duty of Congress to have hearings in order to confirm a Supreme Court Justice nominee (as stated in the Constitution). This exclusive power rests on the U.S. Senate. The consensus, however, may be different and may vote against a nominee. Political parties within the Senate generally get in the way of who will vote and who won't, and vice-versa.

Explanation:

For example, Merrick Garland (former President Obama's nominee) was not given a hearing. Furthermore, Congress failed to perform the duties to have a hearing and decide whether to vote or deny a nominee. This is an example of how they refused to even vote on him. This is not the way government should operate.

6 0
3 years ago
Scott Test solutions that turn blue indicate the presence of:​
zubka84 [21]
The Scott test is a preliminary colorimetric method to analyze cocaine. A blue color result in the final step denotes a positive indication for cocaine; however, some pharmacological products may lead to false positives when concentration is higher than 1 mg
5 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP ASAP!
victus00 [196]

Answer:

rom 2000 to 2003 the percent of local police officers employed by a department with infield computer access to vehicle records increased from 67% to 78%.

Explanation:

I hope this helps.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which forensic scientist helped solve the St. Valentine's Day Massacre?
IRINA_888 [86]

Answer: Dr. Calvin Goddard

Explanation: Valentine's Day Massacre on February, 14, 1929, one of the nation's foremost forensic scientists, Dr. Calvin Goddard, was hired to examine the ballistic evidence. Goddard compared the bullets collected from the crime scene with test bullets fired by a range of firearms.

8 0
2 years ago
On January 1, 2009, a comedian from State A filed a diversity action in State A federal court against an actor from State B. The
VMariaS [17]

Answer:

Yes.

Under Civil and Pretrial Procedures, the comedian may add the additional intentional tort claim as a supplemental pleading to her already existing lawsuit against the actor.  Moreover, the supplemental pleading is very timely.

Explanation:

When the comedian sues the actor for an intentional tort,  she needs to show that the actor, who caused the harm to the car, acted willfully and knowingly.  That means the actor deliberately caused the damage to the car in an act of recklessness.   Since the supplemental pleading for intentional tort is timely, the comedian simply needs to demonstrate that the actor caused the damage to the car on purpose, knowing fully well that his act would damage the car or cause some harm.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • You are the juvenile court judge. It is your responsibility to decide the appropriate disposition for Trey's case. You have hear
    8·1 answer
  • What is a momentum ?
    13·1 answer
  • 5. In a bench trial, the
    10·2 answers
  • All of the following statements about patents are true except: a. in order to be patented, an invention must be nonobvious. b. t
    5·1 answer
  • describe at least 2 examples of how being the victim of violent crime can have an impact on an individual
    7·1 answer
  • What is required in order to charge someone with a crime? (Please use your own words)
    5·1 answer
  • What is the correct answer
    5·1 answer
  • Which form of damages involves a court ordering a party to a contract to perform his/her obligations under the contract
    12·1 answer
  • What does the blindfold covering lady justice eyes represent?
    13·2 answers
  • which criteria must a law meet in order to pass the government’s strict scrutiny test to reasonably discriminate? select all tha
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!