If a case is of a type that can be brought in federal court, that means it can never be brought in state court.

1 answer:

4 0

Most state courts are courts of general jurisdiction, whereas federal courts have limited jurisdiction. That is, state courts are presumed to have power to hear virtually any claim arising under federal or state law, except those falling under the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts.

You might be interested in

Compare the text of the United States' first amendment, guaranteeing Freedom of Expression, with the United Kingdom's Human Righ

jasenka [17]

Answer:

The United States first amendment carried more protection and less restriction in its implementation and here is why.

The edict of the United States does not qualify the application of the clause granting freedom of expression. That of the United Kingdom does. In doing so, it ensures that Freedom of Expression is used appropriately in that it must be targeted at the common good and the well being of the state.

It states, for instance, that

"Public authorities may restrict this right if they can show that their action is lawful, necessary and proportionate in order to:

protect national security, territorial integrity (the borders of the state) or public safety

prevent disorder or crime
protect health or morals
protect the rights and reputations of other people
prevent the disclosure of information received in confidence
maintain the authority and impartiality of judges"

Cheers!

8 0

3 years ago

Explain the types of questions that a custodian of a health record can answer at deposition or trial. Give examples of types of

Arlecino [84]

Answer:

Explanation:

Acceptable questions will include all those questions that will authenticate the records like whose record is this, to which healthcare this belongs to, who is the custodian of the record, to what duration the record was kept by the custodian.

Unacceptable questions should not be answered for those that have the medical information of the patient as to maintain the confidentiality of treatment is necessary to maintain, questions related to the interpretation of the record must not be answered and solicited personal opinion about the health record must not be given.

8 0

2 years ago

1. Is Defensible Space Theory a logical explanation for controlling crime? Why or why not?

Kaylis [27]

Answer:

See explaination

Explanation:

1. The Defensible Space Theory can really be seen as a logical explanation for controlling crime from the perspectives of a defender as well as an attacker. This theory makes use of the science of psychology with the science of meaningful space. When the defender, that is, the home owners will be responsible for their home space, the sense of responsibility will be higher on the same. The home owners will be accountable for their defense. This encourages home owners to design their home space in such a way that they will be able to control their environment based on their present capabilities like family structure, income level, and socioeconomic status. The attacker, that is, the potential criminal will feel insecure and uncomfortable on a highly defended land. So, the probability of the criminal attacking the home space or neighborhood may be lessened. This argument is supported by the study which involved private homes in two high-crime areas in St. Louis. These areas recorded lower crimes than public areas using the Defensible Space Theory.

2. According to the Routine Activity Theory, the condition for crime is the presence of a suitable target(s) and the absence of a guardian(s). It is important to note that something or the other will always be present to motivate potential offenders to commit crime. So, there will always be motivated offenders. If motivated offenders are present, so suitable targets will be present in the society on the other side for crime to take place. So, suitable targets cannot be left unguarded which will increase the probability of crime, considering the target is in an isolated position. Even a weak guardian is sometimes equivalent to no guardian or protector. So, I think, presence of guardian(s), more specifically, more capable guardian(s) plays the greatest role at reducing

8 0

2 years ago

How is the movie Noah ethical and moral?

rusak2 [61]

Noah ethical and moral:

The Movie Noah is Ethical and Moral because the God sees how the humans treat other humans and there is no humanity left in the world he brings a flood but spares the life of Noah, his family and all the animals.

God says the evil was overpowering the good and there was no more purpose of human existence. God values goodness and hence, he spares the life of Noah after getting impressed by the good deeds he did in his life.

This movie gives us a moral value to not harm other humans and animals and only believe in goodness.

7 0

2 years ago

why is there like 4 or 5 different police cars when only one person is running,i know there is theft but even if the person just

Sever21 [200]

Answer:

Explanation:

The reason why there is 4 to 5 police cars when someone runs is because they don't know if the guy/girl is armed. And also he could get away so they have 2 police cars cut him off so they can catch him.

4 0

2 years ago