1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SCORPION-xisa [38]
3 years ago
11

If a case is of a type that can be brought in federal court, that means it can never be brought in state court.

Law
1 answer:
marysya [2.9K]3 years ago
4 0
Most state courts are courts of general jurisdiction, whereas federal courts have limited jurisdiction. That is, state courts are presumed to have power to hear virtually any claim arising under federal or state law, except those falling under the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts.
You might be interested in
What is the burden of proof? Why is it important in both civil and criminal cases?
KiRa [710]
The burden of proof is the obligation to present evidence on the subject of the lawsuit/criminal charge. It’s important to both civil and criminal cases prove or disprove a disputed fact.
6 0
3 years ago
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
2 years ago
Is it illegal for a 24 year old to date a 39 year old?
Mademuasel [1]

Answer: No it is not a legal for a 24-year-old to date a 39-year-old.

Explanation: it is not illegal because as long as they’re not under the age of 18.

7 0
3 years ago
6. If Marcus is caught with a small amount of marijuana but his state won't
IceJOKER [234]

Answer:

B. Decriminalization

Explanation:

He is guilty of possession but due to decriminalization in his State he won't be arrested

6 0
3 years ago
What type of system does Brazil have?<br> Unitary,<br> Federal,or <br> Confederal? *civics*
kumpel [21]
Federal as the picture says in bold it is federal.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In the _______ culture, it would be within norms to see a 15-year-old spending time with her mother instead of with her peer gro
    8·1 answer
  • A school district supplied school bus service for all children 12 years of age or under who lived at least one mile from school.
    5·1 answer
  • What are four major standards in forensic science?
    11·1 answer
  • Dn3rlwdnwqbfy3evfs deubfiwbfweviuebuevyibujbkhvyguhnjkbh
    12·2 answers
  • A low risk environment is a condition when
    14·1 answer
  • The passage is from the Declaration of Independence (1776). Which earlier thinker influenced the reasoning of this passage?
    6·1 answer
  • How did saul become king
    8·2 answers
  • Most of the work of the attorney general involves ________ rather than ________. Multiple Choice ceremonial functions; executive
    15·1 answer
  • Please help !!!!!
    12·1 answer
  • What are the general requirements and major impacts of the gdpr, and how does this law differ from data protection legislation i
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!