Britain would not hand land over to the U.S. that was valuable and fur-trade routes.
Answer:
While African resistance to European colonialism is often thought of in terms of a white and black/European and African power struggle, this presumption underestimates the complex and strategic thinking that Africans commonly employed to address the challenges of European colonial rule. It also neglects the colonial-era power dynamic of which African societies and institutions were essential components.
After the Berlin Conference of 1884–85, at which the most powerful European countries agreed upon rules for laying claim to particular African territories, the British, French, Germans, Italians, Spanish, Belgians, and Portuguese set about formally implementing strategies for the long-term occupation and control of Africa. The conquest had begun decades earlier—and in the case of Angola and South Africa, centuries earlier. But after the Berlin Conference it became more systematic and overt.
The success of the European conquest and the nature of African resistance must be seen in light of Western Europe's long history of colonial rule and economic exploitation around the world. In fact, by 1885 Western Europeans had mastered the art of divide, conquer, and rule, honing their skills over four hundred years of imperialism and exploitation in the Americas, Asia, and the Pacific. In addition, the centuries of extremely violent, protracted warfare among themselves, combined with the technological advances of the Industrial Revolution, produced unmatched military might. When, rather late in the period of European colonial expansion, Europeans turned to Africa to satisfy their greed for resources, prestige, and empire, they quickly worked their way into African societies to gain allies and proxies, and to co-opt the conquered kings and chiefs, all to further their exploits. Consequently, the African responses to this process, particularly the ways in which they resisted it, were complex.
The Murder Act 1965 is an Act that abolished the death penalty for murder in Great Britain. The Act replaced the penalty of death with a mandatory sentence of imprisonment for life.
In Lincoln's view, a union victory and the change of lifestyle in US would mean that the sacrifice has not gone in vain.
Explanation:
For Lincoln, those who died in Gettysburg died for a new and more free US.
This is as such, the reason that they must achieve those ideals and work towards achieving those ideals even harder.
Not only is it important to win the war for the union and keep US united and free the slaves, It is also about living a life more equal
He knew that this would have re defined the nation as a whole and he wanted to ascertain that would in fact happen,
opinion
you can't prove that pigs don't make good pets, its totally subjective
