The assumption the narrator makes in this excerpt would be that the audience they are directing this conversation to through the speaker (not sure if the speaker is a character or narrator so this is just a guess?) is uneducated or believes everything is one way. The character who is speaking references several philosophers and their various arguments, opinions, research and how he/she feels about those writings/topics. In the end of the paragraph, the speaker says "I could interface you guys right under the table" meaning that he/she could converge with them even if he was drunk (interface in the verb form meaning to interact or connect with another person; under the table meaning to be drunk). The last sentence he/she says "I'm not a creatus..." creatus being Latin for born of, or created, or sprung from. This suggests that they are not a God, or one who can create things, and also that they are NOT manufactured, or created in some factory. This means that they are simply smart and they are as they are literally. The narrator assumes his/her audience (to whom he/she is speaking) is not smart enough to understand that he/she is in fact a genius of birth, yet not a God. Smart simply by the means of being intelligent.
Answer:
The statement that explains the Federal Government's approach to economic growth in the late 1800s is <em> </em><u><em>improved productivity,</em></u><em> which is the main cause of economic growth. </em>
Explanation:
<em>"the emphasis was on</em><em> economic performance and how it was affected by new technologies, especially those that </em><u><em>improved productivity,</em></u><em> which is the main cause of economic growth. </em>
Answer:
D. Jules Ferry.
Explanation:
In the journal entry "Imperialism and Resistance Shape the Modern World", authors Saul Straussman and Bridgette Byrd delve into how Imperialism increased and was also beneficial for the European powers. It also reveals how such a process was successful, and how it has shaped the way the modern world is now.
Among the numerous personalities quoted in the article, Jules Ferry would be most likely supportive of the statement that Europeans are superior to other races. This can be judged from his statement :
<em>Gentlemen, I must speak from a higher and more truthful plane. It must be stated openly that, in effect, superior races have rights over inferior races…. I repeat that superior races have a right because they have a duty. They have the duty to civilize inferior races…. (qtd. in Andrea and Overfield 296)</em>
He emphasized and justifies the act of imperialism, implying that it was the Europeans' right and job to 'civilize' the other weaker and lesser races.
Thus, the correct answer is option D.
The correct answer is C) a violent or destructive protest.
The situation would a violent or destructive protest.
The United States Constitution allows its citizens the right to freedom of speech. American citizens can form groups and protest in peaceful ways to express their ideas. It is included in the Bill of Rights. If for any reason, those protests became dangerous acts of violence that put at risk other people or locations, then the government must act swiftly, with determination.
The other options of the question were A) a successful strike, B) a union formed against a company's will, and D) a request by management.
C,because workers were angry that they weren’t getting paid enough
