Answer:
No; Warren weakens her point by claiming that the Paycheck Fairness Act would "give women the tools to combat wage discrimination." No; Warren weakens her point by noting, "Today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes." Yes; Warren supports her point by noting, "Pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women."
Explanation:
In addition to the aforementioned answer, the rhetoric that women make less simply because of discrimination, is factually inaccurate and is not supported by any data. In fact the difference in income is always drawn back to the job choices that women choose. Women are more art/literature bound for jobs whereas men choose higher paying jobs such as STEM, engineering, etc...
The formulas were part of the performance to allow the audience a moment to breathe while the singer could think about the next part of the story. These formulas for different aspects of culture such as greeting guests, eating meals, etc.
The best comparison of the authors’ purpose in these two essays about genetically modified food is:
- The purpose of both essays is to persuade the reader of a specific point of view.
<h3 /><h3>What is the Purpose of a Text?</h3>
A text can serve different purposes. The aim could be to inform, entertain, or persuade the listener.
So when the author in two different essays described the effects of genetically modified foods, his intent was to convince the readers of his own point of view. His views were backed with facts.
Learn more about the purpose of a text here:
brainly.com/question/1119015
#SPJ1
Frttffdsss destgggfgyu was fgggddfttttty