Answer:
<h2>
You move close to the road as if you are about to cross, but this time no to cross, just to get the best view or best line of sight.</h2>
Explanation:
If both sides of the road are greatly impaired by vehicles and you must cross the road at the time, the best bet is to move towards the road in order to get the best line of sight of both sides of the road.
The next step is to observe left for oncoming vehicles observe right then observe left again, if the road is best to cross after this series of observations you can cross.
Answer: the correct answer is C. No, because the jury could find that the company should have foreseen that children would sneak into the park.
Explanation:
In this case, the company has the obligation to forsee possible threats and has no excuse for not having taken action in doing that.
Answer:
Poverty Level would be the answer to your question.
(^_^)
Answer:
The way it can also be seen is that philosofy, rather than provide you with such answers, sets a path for us to come up with our own interpretation of those kinds of questions. Let's take this question, for instance: Does God exist? Nietzsche said he has died but, does that mean he ever existed? Descartes: "Cogito ergo sum", How can someone thinks if not existed already? Philosofy gives you the tools to think of reality and come up with your own thoughts of it. So perhaps it is more accurate to see philosofy as "the mother of all sciences" and start from such an affirmation
Explanation:
We must know the like and the dislike of every child every time we diagnose them. The little things could actually mean a lot to them, and these are just some of the examples that we should consider with. It could make a big impact to them if we make the right decisions right away.
