Answer:
ideology
Explanation:
Over the course of the 20th century, in Ireland, there was gradually declining of dependence on Britain. In 1937, the state was transformed into a republic, and in 1949, Ireland withdrew from the union with Great Britain. Opposite processes were observed in the north, until in 1972 the Northern Irish Parliament was dissolved. The fullness of power in the region passed into the hands of the British authorities; in fact, Northern Ireland was controlled directly from London. In the 20th century, in Northern Ireland, there was an increase in self-awareness of not only of Irish and British, but also of Catholics and Protestants, which shifted the conflict from a purely ethno-political to an ethno-confessional one, and worsened the identity situation on the island. In this regard, the corresponding right-wing parties and organizations gained great popularity among the local population.
As described, I am assuming that by "legislature" you mean "Congress" as in both the House and the Senate.
With that caveat, the correct answers are:
The leader of the House of Representatives is called the Speaker of the House.
Senators are elected for a six-year term.
Answer: the second wave :) have a good day
Explanation:
Citizens participated in the government of Athens by voting directly on issues that affected the state in the Assembly. This was a form of "direct democracy" as opposed to "representative democracy", which exists in the United States.
Answer: Moral relativism
Moral (or ethical) relativism asserts that that there are no "eternal" truths in regard to morality -- things that can be applied to all people of all times in all cultures or contexts. Instead, morality is understood in terms of what is seen as acceptable or noble in the world in which you are living. In this approach, cultural norms have much to do with establishing what is considered "moral" in any particular society. This view of morality thus accounts for why and how beliefs about right and wrong can be seen to shift and change over time within societies.
Ethical thinkers who object to moral relativism would argue that the relativists' approach ultimately means there is no true "morality," because then there is no standard by which right and wrong can be assessed on a lasting basis.
