1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ad-work [718]
3 years ago
10

Which of the following statements accurately compares the politics in ancient China and another ancient river valley civilizatio

ns?
a.) Ancient India and ancient China were both ruled by spiritual leaders.

b.)Ancient Mesopotamia and ancient China were both ruled by kings.

c.) Ancient Egypt and ancient China were both ruled by pharaohs.

d.) Ancient India and ancient China were both ruled by dynasties.
History
1 answer:
Jet001 [13]3 years ago
7 0
The answer is most likely (D). as the two ancient civilizations have been known to once have been ruled by dynasties, such as the Ming dynasty in ancient China and the Chola dynasty of ancient India. As well, both civilizations were ancient river valley civilizations.
Hope this helped.
You might be interested in
What resulted from the corruption investigations in Louisiana in the late 1930s?
gtnhenbr [62]

Answer:

Explanation:

When the Louisiana voters in 1930 elected Huey Long to the United States Senate, the thirty-seven-year-old dynamo already exercised a tight grip over state politics, built up during his years as governor. Unwilling to relinquish the reins of state power to an unfriendly lieutenant governor, Long delayed claiming his Senate seat until January 1932. The next summer, he employed his charismatic eloquence on behalf of both presidential candidate Franklin D. Roosevelt and his personal choice for the second Louisiana Senate seat, U. S. Representative John H. Overton. Long's strength in Louisiana had no equal, and in the September 13, 1932, primary, John Overton easily defeated incumbent Senator Edwin Broussard for the Democratic nomination, a prelude to an unopposed victory in the general election.

5 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast the ways that seventeenth-century
Lina20 [59]

Answer:

<h2>Important differences - Unlike the other two, Charles I was not associated with any political Party, and had not "risen through the ranks" to become Leader. As a King, he achieved his position by heredity, and since no-one can choose their parents, this was used to justify the doctrine of "Divine Right" - God dedcides that a child shall be born into a Royal succession, and it is blasphemy to make any attempt to change this. Similarly, it was therefore the "will of God" that he should be succeeded by one of his children - the eldest son, in the English and Scottish tradition. In England, there was also the unusual situation that, as well as being Head of State, the King was also Head of a particular religious organization - the "Church of England" - which meant that he could not be expected to recognise any other form of Christianity. It was his enforcement of this which aroused resistance by such men as Cromwell, who was against any enofrced religon, and for "liberty of conscience". (This was why Cromwell subsequently also opposed Parliament when it attempted to enforce Presbyterianism,) There is perhaps case for seeing a similarity in Stalin, since "Marxist/Leninist Communism" was in fact a "religion", even though a godless one. There are virtually no comparisons with Hitler.</h2>

3 0
3 years ago
Please help ill give brainly &lt;33 Also if your wrong or you put any link ill report you !!!
Anton [14]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
During the Civil War, Christianity and patriotism were joined in a civic religion unprecedented in American history. How did the
tatyana61 [14]

Answer:

People turned to religion and spiritualism to cope with the unprecedented number of deaths.

Many clergy in the North professed that the war was God's instrument to rid the nation of slavery and turn it into the true land of freedom.

7 0
3 years ago
How did the judicial branch under Jefferson serve as a check on the executive and legislative branch
inna [77]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

The judicial branch served as a check on the Executive and Legislative branch in that teh Supreme Court had the power and the faculty to declare a law unconstitutional.

That was the consequence of the judicial review established by the United States Supreme Court in 1803 when it resolved the case Marbury v. Madison.

The Supreme Court could review and decide the constitutionality of decisions made by the Executive branch and the Legislative branch because no action should contradict the Constitution of the United States.

That is the beauty of the checks and balances system in the federal government. That none of the three branches has more power over the other two.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Mark the three elements that describe the following view concerning treatment of the Central Powers, especially Germany, after t
    7·2 answers
  • Who did the romans destroy
    5·1 answer
  • The what are currently known as the oldest civilization
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these terms best describes Karl Marx? capitalist, revolutionary, and economist revolutionary, economist, and socialist
    7·2 answers
  • 8. "There is not among these three hundred bands of Indians one which has not suffered cruelly at the hands either of the
    14·1 answer
  • What was the major dividing factor between the two first political parties?
    9·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer<br> What was the "Great Compromise" in drafting the
    11·1 answer
  • The U.S. Constitution was created because:
    9·2 answers
  • You must think _____________________ about historical documents, or historical evidence. Your writing
    6·1 answer
  • DjjdjdjxjxjxjxjxjxjDjjdjdjxjxjxjxjxjxj
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!