1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
katrin2010 [14]
4 years ago
10

June's team stopped being productive because it had an internal conflict that the group members could not resolve. A representat

ive from the human resources department attended several meetings to help resolve the conflict and enable the group to move on. The person who did this played the role of ________.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Mademuasel [1]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Mediator.

Explanation:

A mediator is a third party, neutral to the others, that intervenes to try and settle a conflict between the other parties. In this case, the representative from the human resources is acting like one given that he-she is trying to resolve the conflict to allow the group to move on.

You might be interested in
The decades around the year 50 B.C. saw the end of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman Empire. What factors led to the
BigorU [14]
Hey there!

The Roman republic was one of the greatest republics/empires the world ahd ever known. They controlled the entire Mediterranean Region which allowed Romans to call it the <em>Mare Nostrum</em>, or "our sea" in Latin, had may advancements in engineering and language, and left an unforgettable legacy behind.

When Rome fell, the days of the republic were long over. It was after clever Augustus Caesar, or Octavian had tricked the Roman senate into believing he was restoring the power of the republic and created an empire. However, after many years, as history never fails to repeat itself when the past isn't learned from- the empire fell and was broken into many "sub- empires", one of whuch was the famous Byzantine. Many factors led to this sudden demise.

One was the size of the empire. The outrageous size of the empire made it very hard to defend, and instead of working to expand the reach of Roman authority, the empire was too busy defending it.

Also, the army consisted of a lot of mercenary soldiers, who were not loyal to Rome. The size of the army required pay for all soldiers, so the empire charged heavy taxes upon its people, and therefore many became impoverished. This made many people poor, hungry, and dying.

Additionally, the emperors were not very loyal to the empire. Following the rule of emperor Commodus, (whom was very selfish) emperors began to become very, very corrupt. They often took advantage of the treasury to pay debts and take money for themselves. This made money worth less and less.

This unusual spending led to inflation. Prices of goods went up, and money was worth less. This was because the amount of money a coin was worth depended on the amount of silver in the coin. The empire was short on silver, and as a result they could not put as much and money was worth less. Over time, Roman money became worthless.

Emperors could not transfer power peacefully. Often, emperors were murdered by the Praetorian Guard (comparable to the "secret service"), and after rulers died, great civil wars often broke out and killed many people.

While all this was going on, as Romans were dying, emperors were becoming more corrupt, and money became worthless, Germanic tribes began pushing on the borders and were so powerful, the emperor could simply not defeat them. Soon, Rome simply fell.

There were many disadvantages of an empire compared to a republic. First of all, there were no checks and balances. The emperor was considered a god (when Christianity came, that belief changed), and had unchecked power. However, in a republic, power was shared among consuls, the senate, and more. This allowed the empire to make decisions that were more thought through and in favor of the people. Perhaps maintaining the republic would have kept Rome alive. Remember that emperors were not always strong and honest. Often they were weak, and corrupt. That didn't occur with the republic. If a consul, senator, or someone else in power was corrupt or dishonest, another person in government could veto their actions, just like we do in America today. In fact, our government system today is based off of that of the Romans- for example, our Bill of rights is modeled after the Romanesque 12 tables or tablets in the times of the Republic, which was one of the first examples of written law.

If you're interested in finding out more about this topic, I suggest reading "<u><em>The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire</em></u>" by Edward Gibbon.

Hope this helps!
7 0
3 years ago
"paul amato (1983) staged an incident in which a man fell in pain and raised his pant leg to reveal an injury. the staged scene
Juli2301 [7.4K]

In 1983, Paul Amato, a professor of sociology and Criminology at Pennsylvania State University staged an incident in which a man fell in pain and raised his pant leg to reveal an injury. He repeated the staged scene in both rural and urban areas and found that of the total number of people who passed the scene, about 50 PERCENT of those in rural areas stopped to help.

7 0
3 years ago
A new statute passed by the state of Vermont prohibits the sale of any maple syrup not produced in Vermont anywhere in Vermont.
stellarik [79]

Answer:

unconstitutional because of its excessive approach.

Explanation:

As you may already know, all US states are subject to federal laws, which must be obeyed throughout the United States. However, all states in the country have the autonomy to formulate their own legislation that will be valid for the entire territory of the state, as long as it does not go against any federal law. There is a federal regulation that states that it is not allowed to hinder or prevent interstate commerce. From this we can state that the statute created and approved by the state of Vermont, which prohibits the sale of any maple syrup not produced in Vermont, is unconstitutional.

This statute is unconstitutional because, in addition to having an excessive approach, it goes against a federal norm.

5 0
3 years ago
There were several different government throughout all of Greece.In fact, most city-state had a transition of government through
AysviL [449]

Answer: A monarch system would have someone in charge or control of the government or state for a lifetime

Explanation:

A monarch system would have someone in charge or control of the government or state for a lifetime. In most scenario it's usually a royalty kind of government, where you a king or queen ruling until they are dead or removed through force or abduction from the throne or power. In these form of government, the ruler has the final say in every decision, there is usually ruthlessness in leadership and accountability is usually not a thing for them as those who request such might sometimes be killed.

8 0
3 years ago
Which statement best completes the table
zvonat [6]

 <em>The United States Senate's and the House of Representatives'</em>  chambers are part of a bicameral federal legislature. The Senate is the upper chamber of the United States Congress, and the House of the Representatives is the lower chamber. Together they comprise the legislature of the United States.

Answer is C.

5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • When and how long is summer break?
    14·2 answers
  • Which cultural feature is located in northwest florida
    8·2 answers
  • How long does the average high school relationship last?
    7·1 answer
  • Which trait is a characteristic of serfdom
    6·1 answer
  • I need with 7-9 please. Thank you
    9·2 answers
  • The inca road system was important because it connected all parts of the Empire.
    7·2 answers
  • Who was this leader of India often associated with acts of nonviolent resistance?
    11·1 answer
  • The idea of maifest means
    15·1 answer
  • Rebecca is interested in how solving different types of puzzles influences creativity. She will have participants try four diffe
    6·1 answer
  • Why do we feel proud of MT.Everest and Gautam Buddha ?<br><br>​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!