I found the excercise on internet and here are the options for the above questions.
A) what we think will satisfy our sense of what is lacking in our lives
B) pretending that we have finally reached the goal
C) a book or journal in which we imagine the last year of life and write about it
D) a false theory which has been finally given up
The correct option is "A".
<span>
"Fictional Finalism" is p</span>sychoanalytic hypothesis of Alfred Adler. The conviction
that individuals are all the more emphatically roused by the objectives and
standards that they make for themselves and more affected by future potential
outcomes, than by past occasions, for example, childhood experience.
Answer: alternative D.
Explanation: Dr. DeVries should choose his sample population randomly in order for his research to be representative, even having a specific population, which is high school seniors, that he wants to study. By <u>choosing specifically students from an exclusive college preparatory school, he isn't considering how students from other schools might perform in his research test</u>. This would be a very important step for him to understand how the practice in problem solving affects the ability related to it. Otherwise, he will have a distorted result.
First, i would develop a similar product to 'create your own yogurt' but doing it by using natural Ingredients that definitely better for the health. After that, i would create a marketing campaign to create an awareness for the existence of my product. For the cherry on top, i would endorse several health and fitness professional to make a comparison review between my products and my competitor's.
Answer:
The French Crown's debt was caused by both individual decisions, such as intervention in the American War of Independence and the Seven Years' War, and underlying issues such as an inadequate taxation system.
Answer:
Check below, please.
Explanation:
5.
The scale of points produced by Gottman Group has shown two types of couple: High Risk and Low Risk of Divorce.
But the key factor was their interaction on the conversation.
This has shown us that Low risk of Divorce Couples score much more negative points than the High risk ones. And then the "low risk" got into a spiral of negativity so faster then the High risk.
6. The negativity threshold is how bad a Husband and Wife reacts to each other in theirs conversation. If there is a sequence of arguing, bad reactions then a negativity threshold is formed.
7. Similarly to a couple's relationship which is based on how a husband and wife reacts to each other while they're having a conversation, so the same as displayed in the equation

Is the way to countries at war behave.
8. To my surprise, I didn't know there was an equation by Mr. James Murray to explain a pattern of behavior of couples.