Based on Hope's check, her contribution to her RETIREMENT plan b. is pre-tax and therefore not included in federal income taxes.
<h3>What does the check say?</h3>
The check notes that Hope's retirement contribution is not included in her federal taxable income.
This means that the contribution is paid pre-tax and will not be liable for federal income taxes. She will most probably pay taxes on the retirement fund when she withdraws from it.
Find out more on retirement contributions at brainly.com/question/6806179.
Answer:
inaccessibility exception
Explanation:
https://quizlet.com/205638479/b-law-ch-32-flash-cards/
The behavior of Albert is consistent with the law of demand.
The basic law of demand says that the higher the price of a commodity, the lower the quantity demanded; and the lower the price of a commodity, the higher the quantity demanded.
Albert went to his local store, hoping to buy a pair of Levi's for $30, however, when he got there, the price was lower at $18, he then decided to buy more than one because the price was lower. This is the law of demand taking place.
Answer:
$ 52
Explanation:
Given data:
Price of the stock = $ 50
Commission per share = $ 2
Dividends received = $ 2
Now,
the dividends received is not the part of the stock's cost basis, but it is included in the taxable income for the year.
Therefore,
The customer's cost basis in the stock
= Price of the stock + commission per share
or
= $ 50 + $ 2
or
customer's cost basis in the stock = $ 52
Answer:
a. mostly cigarette buyers.
Explanation:
The law of demand states an inverse relationship between quantity demanded of a good and it's price, keeping other factors affecting demand as constant.
Price elasticity of demand refers to the degree of responsiveness of quantity demanded to a change in price.
Alcohol and cigarettes are exceptions to the law of demand since in their case, the factor of addiction presides which outweighs rational decision making.
Thus, price elasticity of demand of cigarettes is inelastic. So a marginally higher price charged for cigarettes will not reduce their consumption.
A new tax on cigarettes would raise their prices. The manufacturers, to cover such taxes and maintain the same margin as before would further raise the prices of cigarettes further.
Thus, the tax burden would be shifted to the consumers and hence majorly borne by them.
