They both kinda went hand and hand. Since even though the US offered money to the EEC, the soviets believed that the money was an act of submission of influence and power to the US, so they denied the money even though the money was offered to all nations of Europe that suffered by ww2.
Nations that were distressed by ww2 or any war after ww2 is vulnerable for the communist expansion.
Question does not make that much sense since the Truman Doc targeted states more in the middle east, asia, and africa. Europe was mostly "stable" post ww2. and the truman doc was mostly assassinate for war torn dis-table nations.
They had a large supply of coal, they were near water, they were able to produce more in factories, and they had the steam engine so they were able to transport more goods faster.
Native aborigines view the European colonization of Australia as a belligerant action because they saw the settlement of europeans as an invasion of their land and an attempt to change their lives. There were many complaints about sexual abuse of native australian women by some europeans. Tensions grew after several massacres of aborigins.
General Cornwallis was (obviously) a general, and that was his main job. As he served in the war/army, he fought as a captain of a league of soildiers and tried to beat another team.
