What led to war in 1914 when the heir to the throne of Austria-Hungary, who was assassinated

1 answer:

6 0

There were many reasons why the First World War happened, I would sum it up to Nationalism, Imperialism, and All around tension. Many countries wanted to test their new technology considering it had been a few years since the last big war. There were mutual defense pacts that the European powers signed amongst one another and when Archduke Franz Ferdinand was assassinated, AH gave Serbia a purposefully impossible list of demands. When they declined, AH declared war. Serbia called Russia to arms and Russia pulled the French in. AH pulled Germany into the war and after the invasion of Belgium, The British Empire entered too.

You might be interested in

The League of Nations was established to: regulate international relations, cease imperialism, increase armaments settle, moneta

Yuliya22 [10]

Regulate international relations.

5 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How is this excerpt from Suu Kyi’s essay an example of the courage she advocates?

sergij07 [2.7K]

Aung San Suu Kyi is considered to be a very brave human being because she stood against the military dictatorship of Myanmar.

Opposed the military government of Myanmar.
Became part of the civilian government of Myanmar.

Aung San Suu Kyi braved arrest, detention, and death threats from the military to keep struggling against them all the while calling for nonviolent protests.

In conclusion, Aung San Suu Kyi can be said to be very courageous because she refused to back down and yet never called for violence.

Find out more on Aung San Suu Kyi at brainly.com/question/1253510.

4 0

3 years ago

Southern apologists claimed the master - slave relationship was more humane than employer - worker relationships because

irina1246 [14]

Answer:

it afforded greater long-term security

Explanation:

it offered more opportunities for job training – this is not the correct answer. Slave apologists from the west didn’t care much for job training opportunities.

it afforded greater long-term security – this is the correct answer. Southerners who apologized slavery thought slaves actually benefited from this way of life where someone offers them control, plan for life, and structured job. In their ideas, slaves would be lost, frightened, even irresponsible if they had freedom. By enslaving them, they believed they gave them security and stability. This kind of life, they argued, is better than workers who had jobs and freedom in the North, as slaves had proper care and protection.

it was actually a "freer" relationship – this is not the correct answer. The southern apologists didn’t claim slaves were freer in this type of relationship, just that it was better for them.

it included women in the workforce – this is not the case. The problem of women's work rights was not mentioned at the time.

8 0

3 years ago

Which is outlined in Article V of the Constitution? the amendment process the federal government structure the ratification proc

lawyer [7]

Amendment Process I say

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What European Countries were part of the colonization of the Americas?

MatroZZZ [7]

Answer: