The author is trying to establish the point that the food provided to the soldiers was of poor quality and in little quantity.
<h3>How can we identify this?</h3>
- The author shows how the food provided to the soldiers was compared to fodder, that is, food inappropriate for humans.
- The author shows how this food could be compared with the feeding of pigs, which highlights the poor quality of the food.
- The author reinforces how inappropriate food was consumed anyway, as it was all the soldiers had.
In the text, the author wants to draw attention to how the soldiers were neglected and fed in a precarious, unhealthy, and insufficient way, not being possible to compare it with food for humans.
This kind of food left the soldiers hungry and weak, preventing them from being able to fulfill their responsibilities as required.
In this case, the author satirizes food, trying to call attention to a change and showing the dissatisfaction of those who need to eat this way.
Learn more about satire:
brainly.com/question/20772859
#SPJ1
A completely new European civilization never really did develop. The Roman Empire didn't just fall off the face of the earth. It directly evolved into what came after. ... they are converted to christianity
Answer:
Thanks for letting me get some points
Explanation:
Answer:
Abiy ahmed was the first prime minister of ethiopia
Answer:
Through the voyages of Christopher Columbus, further conquistadors such as Hernan Cortes and Francisco Pizarro were able to understand the landscapes of the geographic regions in the Caribbean and South America, which allowed them to more effectively colonize the regions.
Explanation:
