The Crucible is a tragedy play by Arthur Miller on which a movie was directed. The difference between the scenes in movies and plays is created to show the element of drama.
<h3>Who is Tituba?</h3>
Tituba is one of the black characters of the story that is an enslaved girl of Kalina nationality and is accused of practicing witchcraft during trials. In the play, it is seen that Tituba is threatened to confess her involvement in witchcraft.
In the movie, she is not threatened but thrashed to admit her involvement to increase the intensity of the drama and to create a greater impact on the audience by showing the discrimination.
Therefore, in the movie, the scenes are different to show the increased drama.
Learn more about 'The Crucible' here:
brainly.com/question/18952970
#SPJ1
That is a Rhetorical question
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Whatever answer you pick cannot suggest happiness or contentment.
Prufrock is singularly lonely and so he observes loneliness around him. He thinks himself useless and ordinary so that's what he sees when he looks up at the windows and sees lonely men smoking their pipes.
Granny Weatherall (look at the name -- is it not symbolic of someone who endures all while wishing for something that seems never to be hers?), is every bit as Prufrock. She wants marriage and it is so deeply within her soul that all other grief is wiped away from her.
So what's the answer. Granny can't live life to the fullest; she simply exists and waits, and wants. Prufrock seems to be the same way. B is not the answer.
Forgive what? Achieve what kind of happiness? No C is not the answer either.
Neither one is at peace either with themselves or the world. It's not D.
That means only A is possible. It's not the best answer, but it is the best of this lot.
Just as an aside, a lot of problems would be solved for these 2 if they could just get together.
Answer:
c) It will require the United States to spend money to defend the islands.
Explanation:
Carnegie believes that conquering the Philippines would cost the US money because it will require the US to spend money defending the islands from foreign invasion.
Answer:
1: Non-verbal communication is very ambiguous. Number of gestures and facial expression is very limited as compared to words and phrases.
2: Nonverbal communications differs from culture to culture.
3: There people and channels involved in communication are complex as well as compound (more in number). The environment (dining and business) makes the non-verbal communication complex
Explanation:
1: The limitation of non-verbal communication because of few gestures and expressions makes it very difficult to properly understand it. Non-verbal communication is just complementary to verbal communication. When stand alone, it cannot offer complete meaning.
2: In this situation, the people involved belong to different cultures, and different background (waitress). Because of this reason there is a clear chance of misunderstanding between people.
3: The situation is also complex because of the setting and context. There might have been some cultural etiquette of eating which Americans were not following. May be loud speaking before eating was what made the Japanese uncomfortable. May be it was frank communication between employees of different designations of the company. These factors make the situation complex. Moreover this non-verbal communication is taking place between people of three different groups/backgrounds i.e. business people from Japan, business people from America, and waitress. This situation adds more the misunderstanding between people in this scenario.
