The main reason why colonists opposed the taxes imposed after the French and Indian War is because they had no "representation in Parliament"--meaning that they no say in which taxes were imposed.
Comparing and contrasting European colonization on East Africa and Central and South Africa shows:
East Africa:
- Trade gave them access to new food crops, textiles and metal
- Slave trade was not as much as other parts of Africa.
South Africa:
- Slavery was rampant.
- Impoverishment of South and Central Africans and wealth to Europeans.
<h3>How was colonization in Southern Africa different from Eastern Africa?</h3>
The colonization in Southern Africa was overall negative as Africans were taken as slaves and treated as inferior to Europeans who took most of the wealth. This was especially the case in Angola, Mozambique, and South Africa.
The East Africans were however not subjugated to much slavery and the trade in textiles and metal brought some prosperity.
Find out more on colonization in Africa at brainly.com/question/1395188
#SPJ1
Answer:
The weaker force is
Explanation:
And I dont know what country has this as history
American settlers, Native Americans, and Mexican Americans faced some conflicts in the Mexico cession. They all faced legal, economic, and social discrimination problems.
In short, conflicts over land and water.
Good luck :)
Answer:
The Pearl Harbor Bombings
Explanation:
The Japanese air force bombed the naval base at Pearl Harbor on December 7th, 1941. This brought the United States of America into World War 2, which eventually led to the nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.