Couldn’t find a direct answer, but D seems the most logical to me.
Hope this helps.
"They will be flexible and inconsistent in doing their job" is the right answer.
According to Hamilton, the judiciary must be autonomous in order to achieve its main goal in a democratic government. It is vitally important in a democracy that individual magistrates and the judiciary as a body are impartial and autonomous of all outside pressures. As a result, the permanent position of the judges would be able to gain the confidence of people and society that their cases will be resolved impartially.
The only option that is not generally a reason why historians study societal change would be "<span>d. to estimate how long it would take to build a road system," since this requires a separate type of research. </span>
The answer is B. Roosevelt's plans to expand the Supreme Court were not well thought out.
