Answer: Honorary events are sorted from oldest to youngest.
Explanation:
- The Romans removed the last Roman king from power and set up a republic. Between 534 and 509 BC, the last Roman king ruled, after which a republic was established. The last king is thought to have been Tarquinius Superbus. History treats him as a tyrant who fiercely dealt with his subjects. In these circumstances, the people stood up against him and removed him from power.
- Thus ended the kingdom period, and a republic was formed. Julius Caesar became the dictator of Rome. It is probably the most celebrated figure in Roman history. After defeating Pompey 46 BC, he was proclaimed dictator. Due to political concerns, he was killed in the assassination. His dictatorship is the first symptom of the disappearance of the republic and the establishment of an empire. So chronologically, this event is the second oldest on the list.
- The "Pax Romana" period in Roman history represents the period of the disappearance of the republic, or the proclamation of Rome as an empire. Historians most often take the year 27 BC to begin the period of the empire. This reshuffle in the country is most commonly associated with Octavian. During the realm, Rome would reach its most enormous territorial scope. Rome will be an empire until the fall of 476 AD.
- The edict of Milan issued to allow Romans to adopt Christianity. The youngest event on this list is the Milan Edict. A game that happened in 313 in the Italian city of Milan. Namely, until that moment, Christians were persecuted throughout the empire. Emperor Constantine allowed the freedom of religion to be edified so that Christianity became a free religion. By the end of the century, Christianity would also become the official religion in Rome.
The case you describe is: SWEATT v. PAINTER
Details:
The case of <em>Sweatt v. Painter (</em>1950), challenged the "separate but equal" doctrine regarding racial segregated schooling which had been asserted by an earlier case, <em>Plessy v. Ferguson</em> (1896).
Heman Marion Sweatt was a black man who was not allowed admission into the School of Law of the University of Texas. Theophilus Painter was the president of the University of Texas at the time. So that's where the names in the lawsuit came from.
In the case, which made its way to the US Supreme Court, the ultimate decision was that forcing Mr. Sweatt to attend law school elsewhere or in a segregated program at the University of Texas failed to meet the "separate but equal" standard, because other options such as those would have lesser facilities, and he would be excluded from interaction with future lawyers who were attending the state university's main law school, available only to white students. The school experience would need to be truly equal in order for the "separate but equal" policy to be valid.
In 1954, another Supreme Court decision went even further. <em>Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka </em>extended civil liberties to all Americans in regard to access to all levels of education. The <em>Plessy v. Ferguson </em>case had said that separate, segregated public facilities were acceptable as long as the facilities offered were equal in quality. In <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>, segregation was shown to create inequality, and the Supreme Court unanimously ruled segregation to be unconstitutional. After the Brown v. Board of Education decision, there was a struggle to get states to implement the new policy of desegregated schools, but eventually they were compelled to do so.
I think it is B. Alexandria, Persia
