Eight soldiers, one officer, and four citizens were detained and accused of murder; John Adams, who would later become president of the United States, defended them. Six of the soldiers were found not guilty; the other two received manslaughter convictions and lighter terms.
What kind of reaction did the British provide to the Boston Tea Party and Massacre?
In response to the Boston Tea Party, the British placed even stricter regulations on the Massachusetts colony. The Coercive Acts amended the colonial charter of Massachusetts, granting the royally chosen governor greatly enlarged powers, imposed fines for the stolen tea, and dispatched British troops to Boston.
To know more about Boston Massacre click on the link below:
brainly.com/question/25916749
#SPJ4
No, it was not moral because it disrupts what they are already trying to fix. When the people come to take over, the people have no more freedom, they have to listen the people that take over. And the people that take over want money, resources, and land, so that makes it even worse for them because of the fact that they are going through all of their resources, and losing their land faster making them even more poor. Sometimes it isn't morally a good thing because many people can get killed or that the empire does not care about the country's health. Hope this helps! Have a good day.
<span>
</span>
Answer:
Ok Hope I get crown:)
Explanation:
Duars, also spelled Dwars or Dooars, region of northeastern India, at the foot of the east-central Himalayas. ... The Western Duars lies in northern West Bengal state and is a portion of the Tarai, a lowland belt linking the Himalayas and the plains region. The Western Duars is an important centre of the tea industry
Answer:
Because he wants his audience to know Vietnam.
Explanation:
King addressed an American audience. He knew that this public did not, in fact, know Vietnam, but they relied on biased and often incorrect information, which painted Vietnam in a different image than it really was. King wanted to bring true information that would show Vietnam as a country that did not deserve to be attacked, much less "helped" in the way it was happening. For that reason, he gave so many details about the political history of Vietnam.
Answer:
This is your opinion not someone else's
Explanation:
Example1- I believe Americans should approve the new constitution because... your reasoning
Example2- I believe Americans should not aprove the new constitution because... your reasoning
If your teacher allows you too you can write you do and you don't it all depends on what you think and if your teacher aproves.
Instead of I believe you can also use I think etc.
Hope this helps :)
