Answer:
This would be a simple situation of a brother following his older sibling.
Explanation:
I've seen this before.
Even though Isaiah has been taught by his teachers and/or parents not to use drugs, he will try it if he sees his brother trying it without the consequences he has heard of from his teachers and/or parents.
Unless the older sibling has done anything wrong in the younger sibling's eyes, the younger sibling will always look up to his older brother/sister. Even if the younger brother has been taught over and over again not to do something because of the horrid consequences that come with it, he will do it if he sees his brother doing the same without the consequences specified.
In other words : If the older brother hasn't been caught by anyone for using drugs, the younger brother will follow suit, or at least try to do the same.
Hope this helps.
<span>Knowing what your listeners value or need and appealing to those values or needs is known in persuasion as: positive motivation
Positive motivation tend to rely on the thought of what things/reward that you might get in the future if you're successful in sustaining your current approach of doing things</span>
The self actualisation process implies that you will be an active learner.
<h3>What is Self Actualization?</h3>
Self actualization refers to the complete fullfillment of ones potential that is achivement to its fullest. For example: a soldier at the gunpoint ready to sacrifice his life for the nation . That phase is for a soldier is of self actualization.
Thus, the self actualization process says that you will be an active learner and therefore will assume the respnsibility of education. the person will apply the eduction and learning took in school level to this practical life.
Learn more about responsiblity here:
brainly.com/question/13807466
#SPJ1
Answer:
Mischel proposed that behaviors are determined mostly by "SITUATIONAL CUES". Up to that point, psychologists in his field had believed that "TRAITS" were responsible for a person’s behavior. Mischel’s idea has come to be called "MISCHEL'S COGNITIVE-AFFECTIVE PERSONALITY MODEL", and the debate over it is known as the "PERSON"/situation debate.
Explanation:
Previously existing trait theories suggests that a person's behavior depends on his/her traits, and they are consistent in different situations.
Walter Mischel criticized this theory and suggests that the way people behave is determined by the situation they find themselves in, and not just the traits they possess. His idea is known as "Mischel's cognitive-affective personality model".
The debate between Mischel and the proponent of trait theories is called the "trait vs state" or the Person-Situation debate.
