Did the north or south have factory production?

History

2 answers:

den301095 [7]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The northern colonies and later states did not have the climate and soil for vast commercial farming, and so had always been a society of small farms and towns with more manufactories than the South. The North needed grain from the Mid-Atlantic region, which needed the business of the North for it's grain production, but the South was self-sustaining in food production. The big business of the South was tobacco farming until the invention of the cotton gin, and then cotton became an economically viable mass product.

Explanation:

here

geniusboy [140]3 years ago

5 0

The north had factory production

You might be interested in

Delegates met at a convention at Washington-on-the-Brazos on March 1, 1836 in order to —

Genrish500 [490]

Answer:

Form a new government

Explanation:

Being discontent with the repeated abuses of the Mexican Government and the Mexican Constitution of 1824, a group of young elected delegates met in Washington-on-the-Brazos, Texas in March 1836, with the purpose of declaring Texas independence from Mexico, forming a new government and starting working on a new Constitution that protected some rights such as the right to due process, to bear arms, to practice the religion they wanted and their right of freedom of speech and press.

8 0

3 years ago

Which describes the purpose of most terrorist attacks

BartSMP [9]

Ignorance describes the main purpose

3 0

3 years ago

What did France hope to achieve during the peace treaty negotiations at Versailles?

DiKsa [7]

They hoped to get their destroyed land paid and fixed by Germany because of trench warfare during WW1 and to reduce Germany military power <span />

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What were some of the first scraps to be domesticated during the agricultural revolution

chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer:

Explanation:

Plant domestication: Cereals such as emmer wheat, einkorn wheat and barley were among the first crops domesticated by Neolithic farming communities in the Fertile Crescent. These early farmers also domesticated lentils, chickpeas, peas and flax.

6 0

3 years ago

In the 2000 presidential election Arizona had 8 electoral votes. What best explains the change shown on this map

Liula [17]

You didn't show a map, but I can explain how electoral college votes are determined. Arizona's number of electoral votes has been growing because its state population has been growing at a rate faster than other states, and some states have seen shrinking of their population.

Here's what the National Archives says concerning how Electoral College delegates are assigned: Electoral votes are allocated among the states based on the Census. Every state is allocated a number of votes equal to the number of senators and representatives in its U.S. Congressional delegation—two votes for its senators in the U.S. Senate plus a number of votes equal to the number of its members in the U. S. House of Representatives.

So the number of electoral votes each state gets (of the 538 total electoral votes) is recalculated every ten years, based on the most recent US Census data.

In the 2000 presidential election, Arizona had 8 electoral votes, as it had also in the 1992 and 1996 elections. That number was based on the 1990 Census figures for population. In the elections previous to that, in 1984 and 1988, Arizona had 7 electoral votes, based on population numbers from the 1980 Census. In the elections of 2004 and 2008, Arizona had 10 electoral votes based on 2000 Census data. In 2012 and 2016, Arizona had 11 electoral votes based on the 2010 Census. So you can see that Arizona's relative share of the national population has continued to grow and affect its share of Electoral College votes.

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers