I'm pretty sure that this is true
Kurt Vonnegut's "The Barnhouse Effect"
1. At no time were his experiments, as Premier Slezak called them, "a bourgeois (characterized by materialistic pursuits or concerns) plot to shackle the true democracies of the world."
2. "Did you give it everything you had?" asked the general dubiously (in a doubtful manner).
3. Many a stouthearted patriot has found himself prone (lying face down) in the tangled bunting and timbers of a smashed reviewing stand.
4. Save for one short, enigmatic (mysterious) message left in my mailbox on Christmas Eve, I have not heard from him since his disappearance a year and a half ago.
Answer:
The answer is " State courts deal with issues of state law and federal courts deal with issues granted to them by the U.S. Constitution."
Explanation:
In the USA state courts have jurisdiction over disputes that have a connection with a state´s laws. They usually deal with common laws. They apply laws existing or approved in a state or that are according to the state´s constitution. The federal courts can only take cases defined in the Constitution of the USA or by federal statutes. The definite level a case may reach is the Supreme Court which is a federal court.
<span>Because Athens was using money from the Delian League.</span>
The correct answer is "Senate members represent state interests while House members represent district interests."
One of the biggest differences between Senators and members of the House are the people they represent. Remember, there are two Senators per US state, no matter the size of the state. However, the number of representatives in the house for a respective state is based on its population. Larger states like California and New York have more representatives due to larger populations.
Due to the larger populations of these areas, the states are broken down into Congressional districts. These districts allow House members to bring up local matters on a national platform.
