Answer:
THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU
Answer:
Yes it is
Explanation:
It is very important to monitor your employee, his growth and performance and contribution to the system of the company, and more importantly, his habit and is relationship with other in the office, his he a bad egg in the system ? So all this can be done without the consent to avoid the employee faking his behaviour ,this will help you to understand the person and see his flawless easily. So yes it is ethical.
Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.
Wanted to make more money off of goods
Because they where trying to decide if African Americans where worth a count in population.