1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lozanna [386]
3 years ago
6

The following is an example of the reasoning of a rule utilitarian: "If the practice of lying is bad, then one ought not to lie

now, even if in this case to lie would actually bring about better consequences."True / False.
Social Studies
1 answer:
IrinaK [193]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

False.

Explanation:

Utilitarianism is a moral and political philosophy which is focused on determing whether something is right or wrong depending on the outcome. The essential thinking is that the most moral choice is one which brings the greatest good for most of the people.

In this case, actions, including lying, are morally acceptable when the bring consequences which are for benefit the most or minimize the harm for most people. Therefore, lying is not always immoral. On the other side, if lies bring greatest good or minimize the harm, sometimes it can be immoral not to lie.

You might be interested in
According to the textbook, infants progress in their first two years from ". . . basic instinctual emotions to learned emotions
sladkih [1.3K]

Answer:

Learned Emotion- Fear

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What other production activities could studios engage in if they didn’t hire these mathematicians and scientists?
elena55 [62]

If production studios didn't hire mathematicians and scientists, they could possibly make more movies, hire more actors and actresses, make documentary films, experiment with different genres, pay extra salary to their employees, improve the set decor, and so on.

7 0
3 years ago
How has the government tried to end wage discrimination?
Tasya [4]

Answer:

Explanation:

The government has tried to end wage discrimination since back in 2016 when the state lawmakers introduced at least 180 bills across the country aimed at shrinking the pay gap. Seven were enacted, dozens are pending and nearly 50 either failed or were vetoed. A year prior, 76 equal pay-related bills were introduced in 33 states. And it’s not just progressive states like California taking the wage gap seriously. Louisiana, North Dakota and Utah are just three examples of Republican states advancing such legislation, said Emily Martin, a legal expert on equal pay. In North Dakota, for instance, a bill passed in 2015 strengthening employer's salary reporting requirements. The state, which overwhelmingly voted for Trump in the 2016 election, proves the issue of pay equity is still being addressed in conservative areas. “I’m glad that states are really focusing on equal pay and exploring new policy solutions to ensure women are paid equally to men, in part because federal policy-making is at best stalled on this issue, and at worst, we might be seeing rollbacks in coming years,” Martin, who serves as general counsel and vice president for workplace justice at the National Women’s Law Center, told NBC News.While equal pay laws passed by Congress include the Equal Pay Act passed of 1963, states are offering creative solutions to expand protections for women and close federal loopholes. Don't Ask, Don't Tell

Bills that prohibit employers from requiring job applicants to reveal their salary history can prevent pay discrimination from following a woman throughout her career. In 2016, Massachusetts enacted first-of-its-kind legislation forbidding employers from inquiring about salary history. Since then, California has followed suit and nearly 20 states have introduced similar measures. “If your new employer is setting how much you make based on how much you made at your last job, given that women tend to be paid less than men, it has the effect of replicating those wage disparities through a woman’s career as she shifts from job to job,” Martin said. “We’ve seen a lot of interest in other states in replicating [Massachusetts’s law].” California, Delaware, Maryland and Connecticut are among the states in 2016 that strengthened laws prohibiting bosses from retaliating against employees who discuss their wages with coworkers. As of 2017, 17 states had "pay secrecy" laws on the books, and some are looking to strengthen existing law. But several states, including Arizona, continue to allow such practices from employers. “You can’t challenge pay discrimination if you don’t know you’re being paid less than a male coworker, but a lot of employers either have formal policies prohibiting employees from talking to each other about wages or strong implicit disapproval for employees talking to each other about wages,” Martin said. Delaware Gov. Jack Markell signed H.B. 314 into law in 2016, making it illegal for employers to require employees to sign a document waiving the right to discuss salaries with other workers. Making Fewer Businesses Exempt

Several states have equal pay protections that don’t apply to smaller businesses or to workers in the private sector, where the wage gap tends to be more pronounced due to a less transparent pay structure. Five states— Utah, Texas, South Carolina, North Carolina and Georgia — exempt small businesses from enforcing equal pay protections, while Louisiana's laws only apply to public workers.

In March, Nebraska amended its equal pay protections to encompass businesses that employ at least two workers per day. Previously, the law applied to businesses with more than 15 workers. “The bottom line is line is protections need to cover everyone and they need to be strong and robust,” Kate Nielson, the state policy analyst for the American Association of University Women, told NBC News. But Will State Legislation Be Enough?

On Equal Pay D

6 0
3 years ago
When an arguer attacks another arguer's character instead of that person's arguments, he or she has probably committed the falla
bezimeni [28]
I would go with... true good luck
8 0
4 years ago
The need for affiliation corresponds to the _____________ level of needs in abraham maslow's hierarchy of needs.
Mice21 [21]
The need for affiliation corresponds to the belongingness level of needs in abrahm maslow's hierarchy of needs. Belongingness is the third level of needs in abrahm maslow's hierarchy of needs. The third level represents the social need for affiliation, also known as love and belonging. 
 
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Describe ONE way in which status of women in South Asia was similar to the status of men in the same region in the 12th or 13th
    10·1 answer
  • If Earth were the size of a marble, how big would the moon be?
    14·2 answers
  • What was one effect of the switch to farming?
    11·1 answer
  • Hans feels ashamed when his parents say, "You should feel bad about biting your sister!" To experience a _____ emotion like sham
    15·1 answer
  • How did the miners help settle the west?
    14·2 answers
  • What are the west African empires in order?
    6·1 answer
  • Austria's cultural preference is for achievement, heroism, assertiveness, work centrality, and material success. This would be c
    14·1 answer
  • Marriage to multiple partners.
    8·2 answers
  • What did the Third Estate demand that led to the Estates General falling apart?
    6·1 answer
  • Describe relations between Japan and Korea in the late 1500s.<br> plz i need help
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!