I believe C. Is correct, hope this helps! :-)
Answer:
I have the power to influence the future of my community by paying attention to the zoning laws, the property taxes, and the bylaws that potential representatives are supporting and voting for the candidate that supports my position on these issues.
Explanation:
The kind of issues that I can influence with my vote are: 1) zoning laws for example. I might be against the construction of high-rises in my neighborhood and I can vote for authorities that claim they will protect the current zoning laws prohibiting high-rise development in my areas. 2) Property taxes are another issue. I might support raising property taxes if they will go to improvements in education in my district for example. 3) Bylaws are another area I can perhaps influence by choosing for whom I vote. The candidate might promise to take a stronger position on the ownership of certain dangerous breeds of dogs in my city, for example.
Answer:Sarah was DECODING the message from Oxy-Clean
Explanation:
The receiver refers to how a receiver takes in the message in it sent form and interpret it translating it in their own understanding in order to make sense of what is being communicated.
The communication will be successful if the recover is able to understand the symbols of the message sent and interpret it properly.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You forgot to include the options for this question. However, we can answer the following.
Nozick’s Wilt Chamberlain example (updated by Professor Sandel to the Michael Jordan example) is supposed to illustrate that "liberty upsets patterns and, therefore, the entitlement conception of justice requires illegitimate restrictions of liberty. This applies to justice in holdings and justice in transfer.
American professor Robert Nozick, known for its interesting work at Harvard University, was a justice researcher and theorist who studied libertarian rights and the role of justice in modern society.
In 1974, he wrote the influential book called "Anarchy, State and Utopia," in which he defended the existence of a non-interventional state that granted liberties to citizens with minimal or none interference in the lives of people.
